2013
DOI: 10.1111/zsc.12015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematics of spiny‐backed treefrogs (Hylidae:Osteocephalus): anAmazonian puzzle

Abstract: . (2013). Systematics of spiny-backed treefrogs (Hylidae: Osteocephalus): an Amazonian puzzle. -Zoologica Scripta, 42, 351-380. Spiny-backed tree frogs of the genus Osteocephalus are conspicuous components of the tropical wet forests of the Amazon and the Guiana Shield. Here, we revise the phylogenetic relationships of Osteocephalus and its sister group Tepuihyla, using up to 6134 bp of DNA sequences of nine mitochondrial and one nuclear gene for 338 specimens from eight countries and 218 localities, represent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
98
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
(268 reference statements)
15
98
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at a regional scale (PMIR and EBMR), the proportion of unidentified Scinax species is more than twice as high (82%) as the estimates for the Neotropics. The increase in the known Scinax species richness from the PMIR and EBMR (450%) is the highest increase in Amazonian frog diversity ever reported, being greater than estimates proposed in studies involving the genera Engystomops (150–250% [5]), Hypsiboas (200–350% [5]), Osteocephalus (37.5%–300% [3, 69]), and Pristimantis (200% [71]). Despite the cryptic diversity [7, 21] and the complex taxonomic history of several Scinax species, the high proportion of undescribed species found in the region of PMIR and EBMR is mainly due to (1) integration of different lines of evidence in the species identification process, and (2) the fact that the region represents one of the most poorly-studied areas in Brazilian Amazonia [72].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, at a regional scale (PMIR and EBMR), the proportion of unidentified Scinax species is more than twice as high (82%) as the estimates for the Neotropics. The increase in the known Scinax species richness from the PMIR and EBMR (450%) is the highest increase in Amazonian frog diversity ever reported, being greater than estimates proposed in studies involving the genera Engystomops (150–250% [5]), Hypsiboas (200–350% [5]), Osteocephalus (37.5%–300% [3, 69]), and Pristimantis (200% [71]). Despite the cryptic diversity [7, 21] and the complex taxonomic history of several Scinax species, the high proportion of undescribed species found in the region of PMIR and EBMR is mainly due to (1) integration of different lines of evidence in the species identification process, and (2) the fact that the region represents one of the most poorly-studied areas in Brazilian Amazonia [72].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Although striking, the severe underestimation of taxonomic diversity observed in Amazophrynella and the existence of multiple lineages in Amazophrynella minuta is nothing particular to this group. Examples of other Amazonian species complexes include Rhinella margaritifera and Scinax ruber , Pristimantis ockendeni , Pristimantis fenestratus , Engystomops petersi , Hybsiboas fasciatus , Dendropsophus minutus and Osteocephalus taurinus (Fouquet et al 2007; Elmer and Canatella 2008; Padial et al 2009; Funk et al 2011; Caminer and Ron 2014; Gehara et al 2014, Jungfer et al 2013). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GenBank sequences were originally published by Darst and Cannatella (2004), Faivovich et al (2005), Salducci et al (2005), Wiens et al (2005), Moen and Wiens (2009), Moravec et al (2009), Salerno et al (2012), Jungfer et al (2013), and Salerno et al (2015). Samples of Phyllomedusinae were included as outgroups ( Agalychnis spurrelli , Phyllomedusa tomopterna , and Phyllomedusa perinesos ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%