Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A systematic literature review

Kitchenham, Barbara; Brereton, O. P.; Budgen, David; Turner, Mark; Bailey, John; Linkman, Stephen

doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009

Cited by 3,242 publications

(2,807 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

2,308

Contrasting

Unclassified

278

Order By: Relevance

“…Taking into account all these proposals, we have decided to follow the protocol defined by Kitchenham in our survey [ [21][22][23]] because it is considered one of the most acknowledged in software engineering. Our paper also takes into consideration Wohlin and Prikladnicki's [51] conclusions about SLRs in software engineering, since they consider that the search strategy is key to ensure a good starting point for the identification of studies and ultimately for the actual outcome of a particular study.…”

Section: Protocol Followed At This Surveymentioning

confidence: 99%

A survey on business processes management suites

Meidan

Garca-Garca

Cuaresma

et al. 2017

Computer Standards & Interfaces

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Protocol Followed At This Surveymentioning

confidence: 99%

A survey on business processes management suites

Meidan

Garca-Garca

Cuaresma

et al. 2017

Computer Standards & Interfaces

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Evidence-based Software Engineering (EBSE) (Kitchenham et al 2004) has been used to provide detailed insights regarding different topics in software engineering research and practice. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is known as the recommended EBSE method for aggregating evidence (Kitchenham et al 2009). Using a SLR, existing works on classification and quality properties of program metamodels and tools are identified.…”

Section: Construction Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Regarding the paper selection process within the SLR, we referred to the process adopted in another successful SLR (Sharafi et al 2015). The aim of an SLR is to aggregate existing evidence on the research questions and to support the development of evidence-based guidelines for researchers and practitioners (Kitchenham et al 2009). During the SLR, several popular metamodels are also identified.…”

Section: Construction Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

ProMeTA: a taxonomy for program metamodels in program reverse engineering

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To support program comprehension, maintenance, and evolution, metamodels are frequently used during program reverse engineering activities to describe and analyze constituents of a program and their relations. Reverse engineering tools often define their own metamodels according to the intended purposes and features. Although each metamodel has its own advantages, its limitations may be addressed by other metamodels. Existing works have evaluated and compared metamodels and tools, but none have considered all the possible characteristics and limitations to provide a comprehensive guideline for classifying, comparing, reusing, and extending program metamodels. To aid practitioners and researchers in classifying, comparing, reusing, and extending program metamodels and their corresponding reverse engineering tools according to the intended goals, we establish a conceptual framework with definitions of program metamodels and related concepts. We confirmed that any reverse engineering activity can be clearly described as a pattern based on the framework from the viewpoint of program metamodels. Then the framework is used (2018) 23:2323-2358 to provide a comprehensive taxonomy, named Program Metamodel TAxonomy (ProMeTA), which incorporates newly identified characteristics into those stated in previous works, which were identified via a systematic literature review (SLR) on program metamodels, while keeping the orthogonality of the entire taxonomy. Additionally, we validate the taxonomy in terms of its orthogonality and usefulness through the classification of popular metamodels.Empir Software Eng

show abstract

“…16,17,18,19]. The most important search terms were "compliance", "conformance", "conformity", and combinations such as "compliance management" and "organi[z|s]ational compliance".…”

Section: Research Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A literature database was created, allowing systematic storage of information on the collected publications during the actual review process undertaken. The database was based on the concept matrix of [16] and the data extraction guidelines of [18,19]. It contained information such as the titles, authors, unit of analysis and substantive conceptual contribution.…”

Section: Research Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Framework for Organizational Compliance Management Tactics

Foorthuis

Bos

2011

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Organizational compliance with laws, industrial standards, procedures and enterprise architectures has become a highly relevant topic for both practitioners and academics. However, both the fundamental insights into compliance as a concept and the tactics for bringing an organization into a compliant state have been described in a fragmented manner. Using literature from various disciplines, this paper presents two contributions. First, it describes the fundamental concepts regarding compliance. Second, it presents a framework in which the various tactics for achieving organizational compliance can be positioned.

show abstract

Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A systematic literature review

Cited by 3,242 publications

References 35 publications

A survey on business processes management suites

A survey on business processes management suites

ProMeTA: a taxonomy for program metamodels in program reverse engineering

A Framework for Organizational Compliance Management Tactics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About