Systematic Assessment Through Mathematical Model For Sustainability Reporting In Malaysia Context

Lanang, Wan Nurul Syahirah Wan; Turan, Faiz Mohd; Johan, Kartina

doi:10.1088/1757-899x/226/1/012049

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Ahora bien, haciendo uso de un enfoque totalmente diferente, como herramienta para establecer la eficiencia en su gestión ambiental, social y económica, de manera externa e interna, los investigadores Wan Lanang et al (2017) establecieron el Green Project Management (gpm) p5 para desarrollar un modelo matemático de medición, teniendo en cuenta diferentes estudios de casos y gestión de la información -como entrevistas a los directivos y juicios de expertos-, el cual establece puntos de mejora en las áreas de gestión de la empresa, el modelo incluye datos de diseño y procesos, para recoger información más detallada, que es analizada con herramientas de estadística inferencial, como el análisis de regresión lineal múltiple para lanzar criterios de mejora, y como paso final utilizaron la normalización de los datos obtenidos (Plessis, 2007).…”

Section: Herramientas Que Se Utilizan Para El Análisis Y Evaluación D...unclassified

sostenibilidad en Colombia frente al desarrollo sostenible en el mundo. Una revisión bibliométrica para el análisis del entorno

Bossa-Benavidez,

David Meza,

Ramos-Franco

et al. 2023

rev.univ.empresa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

En el presente estudio, se utiliza el metaanálisis para contrastar investigaciones realizadas sobre el desarrollo sostenible y su medición al interior de empresas colombianas y otras alrededor del mundo. El contraste se realiza utilizando criterios de selección bibliográfica, proponiendo un Esquema de Clasificación Conceptual (ECC), utilizando un arqueo bibliográfico con la selección de artículos relevantes, con ecuaciones de búsqueda, aplicando operadores booleanos, que permitan llegar a una conclusión para responder las cinco preguntas planteadas en el ECC. Se utilizaron artículos de los últimos 10 años y un análisis de tendencia de investigación del tema planteado, que evidencia la concordancia de los resultados y tiene en cuenta criterios de selección con el ECC. El estudiodemo stró que los países asiáticos y europeos son los principales investigadores del tema tratado, lo cual indica su preocupación por la sostenibilidad ambiental, su compromiso social y su interés por una inversión económica en el desarrollo tecnológico; en contraste, los países latinoamericanos han hecho pocas investigaciones sobre sostenibilidad ambiental y las empresas se enfocan más en el crecimiento financiero que en los impactos ambientales o sociales, lo cual va en detrimento del desarrollo sostenible.

show abstract

Section: Herramientas Que Se Utilizan Para El Análisis Y Evaluación D...unclassified

sostenibilidad en Colombia frente al desarrollo sostenible en el mundo. Una revisión bibliométrica para el análisis del entorno

Bossa-Benavidez,

David Meza,

Ramos-Franco

et al. 2023

rev.univ.empresa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As an example, researchers from China have been publishing more research work than the United Kingdom and is projected to surpass the United States as the largest academic producer [5,6]. Other developing countries such as Brazil, India and South Korea are also expected to surpass France and Japan in terms of technological research output for the next six years [7][8][9]. In this regard, one of the most important tasks of a mathematical modeler is to understand the categories of mathematical modeling output and how these paths of modeling can contribute to the sustainable development of science, technology, engineering and mathematics or also known as STEM-based research output development [10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mathematical Modeling Research Output Impacting New Technological Development: An Axiomatization to Build Novelty

Bajuri

Siri

Abdullah

2022

Axioms

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The mathematical modeling of research-based output impacting new technology development is crucial for a developing country. However, the complexity of modern mathematical modeling research output makes it unclear over how it can impact the development of new technology. Therefore, this study aims to explore, categorize and formulize the axioms of mathematical modeling research output that impacts the development of new technology. Seven participants were involved in this research. Interviews were conducted to explore their remarkable mathematical modeling output and how the output can impact the development of new technology. The categorization axioms are: i. mathematical modeling for theorizing, ii. mathematical modeling for simulations, iii. mathematical modeling for useable innovation and iv. patent and product commercialization. Finally, the categorization can be formulized as an axiom of mathematical modeling novelty, which is the desired research output. Moreover, patents and commercialization are the elements that mathematical modeling should possess for new technological development. The limited number of participants involved in this study makes this study formulation limited to only some types of mathematical modeling output. However, this substantive formulation could give some ideas in proposing the path and processes on how to enhance the effort for society to develop the culture of mathematical modeling in developing new technology.

show abstract

“…1 Legend: A-Verba and Ivanov (2015)[80]; B-Turan and Johan (2016)[81]; C-Turan et al (2016)[82]; D-Salcedo Díaz et al (2016)[83]; E-Szabó (2016)[84]; F-Johan and Turan (2016)[85]; F -Johan and Turan (2016)[86]; H-WanLanang et al (2017) [87]; I-Piterska, Kolesnikov, et al (2018)[88]; J-Lanang et al (2018)[89]; -Feature mentioned by the author on that date and article.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainability in Project Management: PM2 versus PRiSMTM

Marques,

Sousa,

Tereso

2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper makes a theoretical contribution by exploring the integration of sustainability principles into project management. It compares two recent methodologies, PM2 and PRiSMTM, and provides a practical contribution by advocating for the adoption of these sustainability-driven practices among practitioners. Sustainability remains relatively unknown in the realm of project management, and this study aims to bridge that gap. This study follows an interpretivist philosophy and employs a combination of interviews and archival data analysis. PM2, created by the European Commission, provides a project management methodology free to organizations and includes best practices from other bodies of knowledge. However, it does not include sustainability because it aims to be generic. PRiSMTM, based on the P5™, aims to make the project management process more sustainable. PRiSMTM has a P5 Impact Analysis and Sustainability Management Plan as its main differentiating deliverables and is an extension of the Triple Bottom Line, also including product and process. The PM2 Alliance CEO believes that PM2 aims to be generic, so a focus on sustainability would remove the methodology’s “elasticity”. However, users wishing to use PM2 and consider sustainability can include it in the additional objectives and use PRiSMTM to differentiate deliverables.

show abstract

Systematic Assessment Through Mathematical Model For Sustainability Reporting In Malaysia Context

Cited by 7 publications

References 9 publications

sostenibilidad en Colombia frente al desarrollo sostenible en el mundo. Una revisión bibliométrica para el análisis del entorno

sostenibilidad en Colombia frente al desarrollo sostenible en el mundo. Una revisión bibliométrica para el análisis del entorno

Mathematical Modeling Research Output Impacting New Technological Development: An Axiomatization to Build Novelty

Sustainability in Project Management: PM2 versus PRiSMTM

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About