1991
DOI: 10.1049/ip-a-3.1991.0018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthetic theory of Poole and Poole-Frenkel (PF) effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…. A typical measure of the transition field F t between the Poole and Poole-Frenkel regimes is [22] F es…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. A typical measure of the transition field F t between the Poole and Poole-Frenkel regimes is [22] F es…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting derivation gives a simple analytical description in which the transition from Poole to Poole-Frenkel conduction can be tuned by adjusting the parameter δ, however at the cost of a rather unclear physical picture. Yet another model by Pillonnet et al showed that the Poole to Poole-Frenkel transition could also be deduced from Hill's approach [13] by considering a carrier in a pair of Coulombic wells separated by a distance s [22]. Hill's model, however, assumes, just like Ielmini and Zhang, immediate re-trapping after emission which leads to a constant travel distance of the charge carriers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) and (5) in the limit of large and small concentration of traps, respectively, we computed the thermal-emission time by the physical model presented in [16]. In this numerical model, the thermal emission time is calculated by: where is the potential barrier, obtained from the calculated potential profile between two positively-charged sites, neglecting screening effects [22]. Fig.…”
Section: Physical Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intrinsic conductivity of CMX does not vary with temperature, whereas the electric conductivity of the CMX/DC93500 sample decreases by decades from 20 C to 60 C. The evolution of electric conductivity with relaxation time is linked to the electric field decrease; the application of a high electric field across the sample (due to the potential buildup under electron irradiation) distorts the conduction band and traps energy wells, which lowers the activation energy required for an electron to hop to the conduction band and furthers the electron thermal detrapping. This electric field effect on charge transport is known as the Poole-Frenkel effect [10,17].…”
Section: B Batchmentioning
confidence: 99%