2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SYNTAX Score II predicts carotid disease in a multivessel coronary disease population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compatible with these studies, SS I was not associated with CAS whereas age was an independent predictor of CAS in our study [14] . A latter study by the same group of researchers confirmed a relationship between SS II and CAS [15] . A recent study by Avci et al [13] demonstrated the association between SS I and CAS, however, this association was not independent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compatible with these studies, SS I was not associated with CAS whereas age was an independent predictor of CAS in our study [14] . A latter study by the same group of researchers confirmed a relationship between SS II and CAS [15] . A recent study by Avci et al [13] demonstrated the association between SS I and CAS, however, this association was not independent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…A recent study found CAS as an independent predictor of high SYNTAX score (>32), however, the study population was heterogeneous and comprised patients with single and multivessel disease [16] . Up to date, only a single study investigated the relationship between SS II and CAS [15] . Baseline characteristics and risk factors of patients in this study were similar to ours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was explained by evaluating purely anatomic parameters with Syntax score and, in contrast, the Syntax II score also includes clinical data of patients. Costanzo et al [20] also recommended using the Syntax II score for the carotid artery and coronary artery relationship in their recent study, but for peripheral artery disease and CAD, we recommend using the classical Syntax score (based on our study results [20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 , 2 , 3 Since 2013, various reports have described alternative markers, which can be potentially used for the improvement of this scoringsystem. 4 , 5 , 6 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%