2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synergistic S-Scheme mechanism insights of g-C3N4 and rGO combined ZnO-Ag heterostructure nanocomposite for efficient photocatalytic and anticancer activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the extremely limited range of its spectral response results in a low visible-light photocatalytic activity. 10–15…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, the extremely limited range of its spectral response results in a low visible-light photocatalytic activity. 10–15…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the extremely limited range of its spectral response results in a low visible-light photocatalytic activity. [10][11][12][13][14][15] In order to improve the utilization efficiency of solar energy, doping or compositing ZnO with metal, non-metal and other semiconductors are the effective ways to improve the visiblelight photocatalytic activity. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] CuS is a typical narrow bandgap (1.2-2.0 eV) p-type semiconductor material preferred among visible light photocatalysts due to its low toxicity, simple preparation, and excellent physical and chemical stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…67 The photoinduced e CB − at GCN can efficiently react with O 2 and produces O 2 ˙, whereas the h VB + at CuO and ZnO has adequate oxidative potential to oxidize OH − to produce ˙OH. 68 In addition, significant quenching in the recombination rate of photocarriers confirmed by PL, EIS, and photocurrent analyses might be assigned to the construction of the dual S-scheme mode on Zn–GCN–Cu because such a prolonged separation of photocarriers can result from the S-scheme. As mentioned earlier, owing to the S-scheme charge transfer mode, a negative charge layer originates in ZnO and CuO compared to the counter surface charge layer in GCN, which consequently produced an IEF to push the photoinduced e CB − at ZnO and CuO to recombine with the h VB + at GCN to support the S-scheme charge transfer mode.…”
Section: Photocatalytic Activity Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carbon materials such as GO, RGO, CNTs, graphene aerogels, carbon xerogel, and CDs exhibit various functional properties that can benefit the photocatalytic reactions. ,,,,, Like GCN, GOs also serve as excellent substrates for the growth of ZnO and inhibit their growth during the crystallization step . The GO can trap the excited electrons from the CB of ZnO and GCN, thereby preventing electron–hole recombination.…”
Section: Modified Gcn/zno Based Heterostructurementioning
confidence: 99%