2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41524-021-00637-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Symmetry-aware recursive image similarity exploration for materials microscopy

Abstract: In pursuit of scientific discovery, vast collections of unstructured structural and functional images are acquired; however, only an infinitesimally small fraction of this data is rigorously analyzed, with an even smaller fraction ever being published. One method to accelerate scientific discovery is to extract more insight from costly scientific experiments already conducted. Unfortunately, data from scientific experiments tend only to be accessible by the originator who knows the experiments and directives. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 295 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some recent examples include Bayesian optimization, 70 unsupervised learning control and structure of domain walls, 71 defects in lead zirconate titanate (PZT), 72 and a synthesisstructure-property relationship discovery tool based on a large (roughly 25 k) PFM image database. 73 It is well known that models trained on these datasets will typically have microscope calibration and reproducibility limitations that stem from instrumental crosstalk, sample and probe state variations, and limited data sizes-all in addition to the sample properties and functionality questions that were presumably the motivation for the measurements in the first place. To enable these exciting new capabilities on a wider scope and to avoid "garbage-in, garbage-out" scenarios, it is important for the measurements to become as accurate and reproducible as possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent examples include Bayesian optimization, 70 unsupervised learning control and structure of domain walls, 71 defects in lead zirconate titanate (PZT), 72 and a synthesisstructure-property relationship discovery tool based on a large (roughly 25 k) PFM image database. 73 It is well known that models trained on these datasets will typically have microscope calibration and reproducibility limitations that stem from instrumental crosstalk, sample and probe state variations, and limited data sizes-all in addition to the sample properties and functionality questions that were presumably the motivation for the measurements in the first place. To enable these exciting new capabilities on a wider scope and to avoid "garbage-in, garbage-out" scenarios, it is important for the measurements to become as accurate and reproducible as possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of symmetry in the morphology of a neural network is an effective way to improve its ability in order to recognise patterns and detect patterns in image databases [9,10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first applications of modern DL techniques to scanning probe [175] and scanning transmission electron [53] microscopy were demonstrated in 2017 for the off-line data analysis. Since then, there has been a growing interest in using deep and ML to automate routine analysis of microscopy data (such as atom/defect/particle finding) [8,155,[176][177][178][179], learning symmetries [180], and to extract physically meaningful latent parameters explaining high-dimensional observations [138,143,144,157,[181][182][183]. More recently, the pre-trained DL models were used to identify on-the-fly objects of interests, such as domain walls and atomic defects, in automated experiments in scanning probe and electron microscopy.…”
Section: Current State Of ML In Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%