2002
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2002.801955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Switching behavior of single nanowires inside dense nickel nanowire arrays

Abstract: We report on the micromagnetic properties of highly regular hexagonal arrays of Ni nanowires, fabricated by means of electodeposition in self-ordered porous alumina. Arrays with interpore distances of 65 and 100 nm and pore diameters of 25 and 30 nm are investigated. From hysteresis loops obtained from measurements with a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer, the switching field sw of the nanowires and its deviation 1 sw is derived. Dynamic micromagnetic modeling using the finite-el… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
53
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(24 reference statements)
4
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion is consistent with reports in similar systems in which the magnetostatic coupling effects were inferred indirectly from the analysis of the hysteresis loops. 10,13,14 Moreover, in our study, we observe a more consistent dependence of the strength of the magnetostatic coupling on the diameter of the nanowires than in earlier reported data, presumably due to the lack of inhomogeneous magnetization states for this particular magnetic field configuration and history. 4 However, as seen in the experimental data, while the amplitude of the peaks in the modified Henkel plots increases as the nanowire diameter is increased, this change does not scale linearly with the magnetic moment associated with the nanowires, i.e., proportional to the volume of the nanowires, as expected in a simple dipole approximation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This conclusion is consistent with reports in similar systems in which the magnetostatic coupling effects were inferred indirectly from the analysis of the hysteresis loops. 10,13,14 Moreover, in our study, we observe a more consistent dependence of the strength of the magnetostatic coupling on the diameter of the nanowires than in earlier reported data, presumably due to the lack of inhomogeneous magnetization states for this particular magnetic field configuration and history. 4 However, as seen in the experimental data, while the amplitude of the peaks in the modified Henkel plots increases as the nanowire diameter is increased, this change does not scale linearly with the magnetic moment associated with the nanowires, i.e., proportional to the volume of the nanowires, as expected in a simple dipole approximation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…While understanding how the size and geometry affect properties such as coercivity and thermal stability is critical for the applicability of these systems for magnetic storage, it is equally important to understand the magnetic interactions in high density arrays and the dependence of these couplings on the magnetic structure of the individual nano-objects. 9,10 In this paper, we investigate the magnetic interactions in ordered arrays of electrodeposited magnetic nanowires. For all the arrays investigated, the magnetostatic coupling between the nanowires plays an important role during the switching process as expected for a system of closely packed magnetic particles with large geometric anisotropy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the magnetic field strength by -2 mT will lead to the propagation of the domain wall, i.e. a rapid switching process, as expected [49,50].…”
Section: Properties Of Individual Nanomagnetsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…2͑b͒ and 2͑c͒ cannot be explained through coherent magnetization rotation. Indeed, computer simulations by Ross et al 15 and Nielsch et al 16 show that the magnetization process in the nanostructures is evidently different from the abrupt coherent magnetization reversal predicted by SW model. For the nanostructures with small aspect ratio, the magnetization occurs through incoherent magnetization reversal, 15 whereas in nanowires domain walls nucleate at the ends of the wires and propagate along the wires.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%