2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainable evaluation of environmental and occupational risks scheduling flexible job shop manufacturing systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the third generation, the survival duration of individual 5 and individual 52 is 2, while the survival duration of individual 202 is 1. The survival duration of the best individual of each objective is calculated according to Equation (18).…”
Section: Calculate the Survival Duration Of All Individuals And Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the third generation, the survival duration of individual 5 and individual 52 is 2, while the survival duration of individual 202 is 1. The survival duration of the best individual of each objective is calculated according to Equation (18).…”
Section: Calculate the Survival Duration Of All Individuals And Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By proposing a new multi-objective robust optimization for a factory microgrid, the approach can be considered risk-based, as it considers the conditional value-at-risk. Coca et al [21] illustrate the simultaneous evaluation of sustainability dimensions, containing environmen-tal and occupational risks with an industrial case from the metal-mechanic sector. Energy flexibility in production systems is specifically considered in the work of Simon et al [22].…”
Section: Risk Management and Energy-oriented Ppcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a job shop scheduling environment, Ref. [186] considered different energy sources with sourcespecific emission factors and presented a multi-objective optimization approach that aimed to minimize energy-related emissions among other conflicting economic, environmental, and social objectives.…”
Section: Multiple Energy Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%