2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32081-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sustainability Appraisal: Quantitative Methods and Mathematical Techniques for Environmental Performance Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 221 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last few years, in light of the above mentioned global challenges, various sustainability assessment methods as well as related studies have emerged (Jørgensen et al 2008;Hansmann et al 2012;Carraro et al 2013;Linke et al 2013;Macombe et al 2013;Graymore 2014;Chhipi-Shrestha et al 2015;Sawaengsak and Gheewala 2017). Despite the value of such studies, they are not exempt of some methodological or conceptual limitations.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Over the last few years, in light of the above mentioned global challenges, various sustainability assessment methods as well as related studies have emerged (Jørgensen et al 2008;Hansmann et al 2012;Carraro et al 2013;Linke et al 2013;Macombe et al 2013;Graymore 2014;Chhipi-Shrestha et al 2015;Sawaengsak and Gheewala 2017). Despite the value of such studies, they are not exempt of some methodological or conceptual limitations.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some indexes employ an aggregation methodology based on subjective expert evaluations (Carraro et al 2013). Finally, few methodologies take into account all the stages of the supply chains across various sectors and countries ).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations