2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/370964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Susceptibility of Clinical Moraxella catarrhalis Isolates in British Columbia to Six Empirically Prescribed Antibiotic Agents

Abstract: Moraxella catarrhalis has the ability to cause upper and lower respiratory tract infections. Typically, antibiotic susceptibility is not tested on isolation of the organism, but a reference document summarizing predicted susceptibilities is provided. The authors of this article aimed to determine the current susceptibilities of this organism in British Columbia, to update the predicted susceptibilites and ensure that appropriate antibiotic prescribing will occur.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other antimicrobial agents, such as tetracycline, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole have also been empirically used to treat M. catarrhalis infections worldwide with apparent success. All clinical isolates collected in this study showed 100% susceptibility to tetracycline and erythromycin which is consistent with the most current international research [18]. Nevertheless, the antimicrobial resistance threat must keep the clinical community vigilant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Other antimicrobial agents, such as tetracycline, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole have also been empirically used to treat M. catarrhalis infections worldwide with apparent success. All clinical isolates collected in this study showed 100% susceptibility to tetracycline and erythromycin which is consistent with the most current international research [18]. Nevertheless, the antimicrobial resistance threat must keep the clinical community vigilant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…were sensitive to all antibiotics. A similar result was obtained by Bandet et al (2014) who reported that M. catarrhalis was susceptible to many of the antibiotics. On the other hand, Samuel et al (2019) stated that M. catarrhalis was highly resistant to ampicillin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This is a source of confusion for clinicians. Previous reports documented high susceptibility rates of M. catarrhalis isolates to third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins (such as ceftriaxone and ceftazidime) and amoxicillin–clavulanic, at nearly 100% [ 9 , 11 – 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three antimicrobial resistance judgemnet criteria can be used to analyze the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of M. catarrhalis strains: the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [ 8 ], and the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) [ 9 ]; CLSI is most commonly used in China. Because of the lack of a unified testing method and judgemnet criteria for antibiotic resistance of M. catarrhalis , data from different areas show significant differences [ 10 , 11 ]. Moreover, susceptibility testing of M. catarrhalis is not routinely performed in most diagnostic laboratories, and many resistance data derive from large cities, with few studies conducted in more rural areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%