2018
DOI: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.1.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival rate of modern all-ceramic FPDs during an observation period from 2011 to 2016

Abstract: PURPOSEIn literature, many studies compare survival rates of different types of FPDs. Most of them compared restorations, which originated from one university, but from different clinicians. Data about restoration survival rates by only one experienced dentist are very rare. The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival rate of allceramic FPDs without the blurring effects of different clinicians.MATERIALS AND METHODS153 veneeredzirconia FPDs were observed for follow-up. 22 patients received 131 single cro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The molars are subjected to significantly higher occlusal forces ranging from 300 Newton’s (N) to 800 N compared to the anterior teeth that are subjected to 60 N to 200 N. In fact, the occlusal loads can reach up to 1000 N in certain individuals with parafunctional habits [ 22 , 23 ]. Nevertheless, the data available on the survival rates and complications of Zr FPDs is sparse and controversial, due to the variations in the study designs and variables [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molars are subjected to significantly higher occlusal forces ranging from 300 Newton’s (N) to 800 N compared to the anterior teeth that are subjected to 60 N to 200 N. In fact, the occlusal loads can reach up to 1000 N in certain individuals with parafunctional habits [ 22 , 23 ]. Nevertheless, the data available on the survival rates and complications of Zr FPDs is sparse and controversial, due to the variations in the study designs and variables [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review about implant-supported multi-unit fixed prosthesis Pott et al [47] Compared all-ceramic single crowns and FPD…”
Section: Holm Et Al [46]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For better performance regarding cracking and delamination resistance under repeated load cycles, which is the most frequent mechanical stimulus in a clinical scenario [23,24,40], the adhesion Table 4. Survival rates, i.e.…”
Section: Control Grindingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, understanding the adhesion mechanism between both ceramics and its influence over the materials' strength are not yet fully elucidated and remains contradictory. It is also essential to evaluate the performance of allceramic restorations under cyclic loading which occurs daily in the oral environment to better understand the influence of the zirconia surface treatments on the longevity of these restorations [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%