2022
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and Comparison of Five-Year Survival of Tooth-Supported Porcelain Fused to Metal and All-Ceramic Multiple Unit Fixed Prostheses: A Systematic Review

Abstract: The prosthesis must have good survival despite being functional for at least 5-10 years. This makes sure that the replacement of missing teeth does not become a repeated expense. Of 579 identified articles, 15 met the inclusion criteria for systematic review. Missing teeth replacement materials are divided into two groups: porcelain fused to metal and all ceramics. Data related to survival rates as well as the most common mode of failure is observed from both groups. It was observed that porcelain fused to met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The blue color and the number 1 represent the defects, the inclusions, and the voids in the ceramic material; the yellow color and the number 2 represent the pores in the ceramic component. For the sintered part, the deposited ceramic has a crack (number 3) shown by white in Figure 3, and poor adhesion between the two components (4-red), as well as a visible defect in the metal part (5). For specimens obtained by milling, an improvement in the appearance of the micrography was observed, in the form of a slightly more homogeneous structure than that of the cast samples.…”
Section: Optical Microscopymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The blue color and the number 1 represent the defects, the inclusions, and the voids in the ceramic material; the yellow color and the number 2 represent the pores in the ceramic component. For the sintered part, the deposited ceramic has a crack (number 3) shown by white in Figure 3, and poor adhesion between the two components (4-red), as well as a visible defect in the metal part (5). For specimens obtained by milling, an improvement in the appearance of the micrography was observed, in the form of a slightly more homogeneous structure than that of the cast samples.…”
Section: Optical Microscopymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The systems obtained from these two types of materials have been successfully used in recent years, thanks to their ability to meet the functional requirements of dental restorations and, at the same time, offer excellent aesthetic results [ 2 , 3 ]. Their good corrosion behavior, especially under the influence of liquids in the oral cavity as well as their biocompatibility with oral tissues, have made them one of the most demanded options on the market [ 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation