Survey on Private Blockchain Consensus Algorithms

Pahlajani, Sunny; Kshirsagar, Avinash; Pachghare, Vinod

doi:10.1109/iciict1.2019.8741353

Cited by 89 publications

(44 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Stevens et al 2016 [16] Conti et al 2018 [32] Salman et al 2019 [35] Barron et al 2016 [53] Fu et al 2019 [21] Lu et al 2017 [54] Cyber Resilience Acharjamayum et al 2018 [30] Divey et al 2019 [99] Wang et al 2019 [47] Fraga-Lamas et 2019 [9] Shahaab et al 2019 [3] Ben?i? et al 2018 [10] Maple et al 2019 [29] Alotaibi 2019 [37] Hou et al 2019 [36] He et al 2018 [42] Onwubiko 2020 [41] Sharma et al 2019 [43] Saini et at 2019 [44] Security Frameworks & Solutions Hasan et al 2020 [100] Jaiswal et al 2019 [75] Lallas et al 2019 [79] Madhumida et al 2019 [55] Bose et al 2018 [85] Shwetha et al 2019 [102] Ramalingaiah et al 2018 [103] Omar et al 2019 [104] Li et al 2019 [86] Ding et al 2020 [90] Li et 2018 [105] Xie et al 2018 [91] Bodkhe et al 2019 [94] Epiphaniou et al 2020 [5] Ledwaba et al 2019 [106] Seitz et al 2018 [107] Abdellatif et 2018 [108] Stodt et al 2018 [109] Devi et al 2019 [110] Wang et al 2019 [98] Matzutt et al 2018 [111 ] Sidorov et al 2018 [96] Dinh et al 2018 [48] Demir et al 2018…”

Section: Security Compliancementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other forms of BFT are Stellar consensus protocol [47] and Delegated BFT. Proof of work (PoW), Proof of stake (PoS), Proof of Elapsed Time (PoET), Proof of Storage and Proof of Authority (PoA) are also types of consensus protocols for validating transactions [32], [43], [48], [47]. Monrat et al [46] made several suggestions for improvement such as standardization and testing based on selected criteria to determine the capability of the system.…”

Section: A Cyber Resiliencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Consensus in public BC requires more computational power and is resource intensive. However, in private and consortium networks, the selection of known entities mean that complex voting systems can be avoided thus consensus mechanisms tend to be less resource intensive and more efficient [48].…”

Section: ) Consensusmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Distributed Ledger Technologies in Supply Chain Security Management: A Comprehensive Survey

Asante

Epiphaniou

Maple

et al. 2023

IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Security Compliancementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: A Cyber Resiliencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Distributed Ledger Technologies in Supply Chain Security Management: A Comprehensive Survey

Asante

Epiphaniou

Maple

et al. 2023

IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A novel framework of PoX is presented based on security and computational performance parameters along with tradeoffs in integrating BC as an incentive mechanism. Pahlajani et al [13] presented a proof-based taxonomy of decentralized consensus algorithms based on business analytics to form informed decisions in the applied manufacturing industry sector. Kim et al [14] outlined the survey on an energy-effective and secure consensus algorithm for private blockchain systems.…”

Section: B Existing Surveysmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Survey on Decentralized Consensus Mechanisms for Cyber Physical Systems

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modern industry 4.0 applications are shifting towards decentralized automation of computing and cyber-physical systems (CPS), which necessitates building a robust, secure, and efficient system that performs complex interactions with other physical processes. To handle complex interactions in CPS, trust and consensus among various stakeholders is a prime concern. In a similar direction, consensus algorithms in blockchain have evolved over the years that focus on building smart, robust, and secure CPS. Thus, it is imperative to understand the key components, functional characteristics, and architecture of different consensus algorithms used in CPS. Many consensus algorithms exist in the literature with a specified set of functionalities, performance, and computing services. Motivated from these facts, in this survey, we present a comprehensive analysis of existing state-of-the-art consensus mechanisms and highlight their strength and weaknesses in decentralized CPS applications. In the first part, we present the scope of the proposed survey and identify gaps in the existing surveys. Secondly, we present the review method and objectives of the proposed survey based on research questions that address the gaps in existing studies. Then, we present a solution taxonomy of decentralized consensus mechanisms for various CPS applications. Then, open issues and challenges are also discussed in deploying various consensus mechanisms in the CPS with their merits and demerits. The proposed survey will act as a road-map for blockchain developers and researchers to evaluate and design future consensus mechanisms, which helps to build an efficient CPS for industry 4.0 stakeholders.

show abstract

“…Consensus algorithms are of two main categories: 21 proof‐based and vote‐based 31 . In proof‐based consensus algorithms, the nodes joining the network have to solve a cryptographic problem to be able to append a block, while in vote‐based consensus algorithms, there is a voting system that elects miners.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Permissionless proof‐of‐reputation‐X: A hybrid reputation‐based consensus algorithm for permissionless blockchains

Abdo

Sibai

Demerjian

2020

Trans Emerging Tel Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the past years, blockchain technology has become more and more interesting since its ability to carry out transactions without any mediator. To ensure the transactions' reliability, consensus algorithms are adopted by blockchain technology. However, due to the failure of consensus algorithms in managing nodes' identities, blockchain technology is considered inappropriate for many applications. In this article, we propose the permissionless proof‐of‐reputation‐X (PL‐PoRX) that upgrades an existing consensus algorithm, the proof‐of‐reputation‐X (PoRX). PL‐PoRX replaces the trusted identity database in PoRX with a new admission process to make the algorithm suitable for permissionless blockchains, while maintaining PoRX's reputation mechanism. Several experiments are conducted to show the efficiency of our approach under different scenarios. We also debate the security model of the new protocol and study its time complexity. The results show that PL‐PoRX decreases the number of blocks issued by malicious miners, and help benign miners build reputation faster.

show abstract

Survey on Private Blockchain Consensus Algorithms

Cited by 89 publications

References 2 publications

Distributed Ledger Technologies in Supply Chain Security Management: A Comprehensive Survey

Distributed Ledger Technologies in Supply Chain Security Management: A Comprehensive Survey

A Survey on Decentralized Consensus Mechanisms for Cyber Physical Systems

Permissionless proof‐of‐reputation‐X: A hybrid reputation‐based consensus algorithm for permissionless blockchains

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About