2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03537.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surveillance of occupational skin disease: EPIDERM and OPRA

Abstract: Consultant dermatologists in the U.K. have been reporting to EPIDERM, a voluntary surveillance scheme for occupational skin disease, since February 1993; reporting by occupational physicians to the scheme began in May 1994 and was superseded in January 1996 by OPRA (Occupational Physicians Reporting Activity). Currently 244 dermatologists and 790 occupational physicians report incident cases to these schemes. During the 6 years to January 1999 a total of 12, 574 new cases of occupational skin disease was estim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
126
1
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
10
126
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This was also higher than the prevalence of 22.5% for occupational skin diseases from occupational solvent exposure by Goon and Goh (2000). Occupational exposure to detergents, occlusive glove use and wet work found in previous studies accounted for only 12.7%, 6.2%, and 11.1% of the prevalence rates of contact dermatitis, respectively (Cherry et al, 2000). These potential confounding factors are not able to account for the significantly higher prevalence of occupational contact dermatitis on hands in this study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…This was also higher than the prevalence of 22.5% for occupational skin diseases from occupational solvent exposure by Goon and Goh (2000). Occupational exposure to detergents, occlusive glove use and wet work found in previous studies accounted for only 12.7%, 6.2%, and 11.1% of the prevalence rates of contact dermatitis, respectively (Cherry et al, 2000). These potential confounding factors are not able to account for the significantly higher prevalence of occupational contact dermatitis on hands in this study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…2,3 They are known to be extremely sensitizing to the skin and can sensitize upon first contact. 4 ACD has been reported from various epoxy resin system components, [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] most commonly from exposure to DGEBA and DGEBF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The burden of occupational skin disease is now widely recognised and is increasing. 22 Occupations most prejudicial to skin health include hairdressing, machine tool operation and printing. The cost of absenteeism due to occupational skin disease is increasing, and medico-legal issues arising from compensation claims are a regular feature of the contemporary dermatologist's work.…”
Section: Environmental Dermatologymentioning
confidence: 99%