2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-015-0690-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical management of vestibular schwannomas after failed radiation treatment

Abstract: Increasing numbers of patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) have been treated with focused-beam stereotactic radiation treatment (SRT) including Gamma knife, CyberKnife, X-knife, Novalis, or proton beam therapy. The purpose of this study was to document the incidence of tumor regrowth or symptoms that worsened or first developed following SRT and to discuss surgical strategies for patients who have failed SRT for VS. A consecutive series of 39 patients with SRT failed VS were surgically treated. Clinical sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In their recent literature review, Husseini et al [68] reported a worsened FN function in rescue surgery in up to 83% of cases, difficult dissection between 43 and 100%, and rates of GTR between 0 and 89%. These results are in line with data published in the largest series [40,68,120,141,179], which agree that salvage surgery is associated with increased risk of nerve damage and greater difficulty in dissection. Caution should be exercised in interpreting this data as most series include a small number of cases, a heterogenous group of patients operated by surgeons of varying experiences [48].…”
Section: Rescue Surgery For Large Vs After Srssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In their recent literature review, Husseini et al [68] reported a worsened FN function in rescue surgery in up to 83% of cases, difficult dissection between 43 and 100%, and rates of GTR between 0 and 89%. These results are in line with data published in the largest series [40,68,120,141,179], which agree that salvage surgery is associated with increased risk of nerve damage and greater difficulty in dissection. Caution should be exercised in interpreting this data as most series include a small number of cases, a heterogenous group of patients operated by surgeons of varying experiences [48].…”
Section: Rescue Surgery For Large Vs After Srssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The reported rates of GTR after CVS surgery range between 44% and 94.6%, 22,28,35,37 depending on the size and extension of the tumor, history of previous treatment, and the surgeon's experience. 26,28,31 In the present study, the rate of GTR was not significantly different between CVSs and SVSs (p = 0.08). Although residual CVSs have been reported to be associated with rapid regrowth requiring reoperation, 18,35 we have not observed regrowth in any of our patients with residual CVSs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Moreover, surgery after failed radiosurgery may result in decreased rates of GTR as well as increased morbidity due to adhesions and thickening and increased hypervascularity of the tumor capsule. 26 We believe that, in cases of large cystic tumors with brainstem compression, microsurgical resection remains the treatment of choice whenever GTR or NTR is possible. 2,11 Nonetheless, multicenter comparative studies with large numbers of patients and longer follow-up periods are warranted to compare the efficacy of radiosurgery versus microsurgery in the management of large CVSs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover several studies, about surgical excision after radiotherapy report technical difficulties, adhesion of the facial nerve to the tumor remnant, scarring and fibrosis, were increasing complications potential. 31,32 Hearing preservation potential could be an important treatment choice factor. Elliot et al did not find statistically significant differences in hearing assessment between conservatively managed patients and patients who underwent stereotactic radiosurgery, in a 132 case series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%