Abstract:Objective: During pectopexy surgery, the prolapsed uterus or the vaginal apex is fixed to the pectineal ligament. The anatomic structures found in the lateral part of the prevesical and paravaginal space above the obturator fossa, raise the importance of the surgical steps required to prevent complications. This study was conducted to evaluate the proximity of vascular structures to the pectineal ligament. Materials and Methods: The distances between the surgical suturing area during pectopexy surgery and the … Show more
“…2 g). A cadaver study showed that the mean distance from the midpoint of the pectineal ligament to the external iliac vein was 1.04–1.25 cm and to the obturator canal was 3.12–3.57 cm [ 15 ]. The obturator nerve passes below the pectineal ligament and is relatively distant from the dissection plane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A vessel that may be encountered during pectineal ligament preparation is the pubic vein, also called the corona mortis (Fig. 2 h), which is the anastomosis of the external iliac vein and obturator vein and lies on the pectineal ligament [ 15 ]. It can simply be cauterized if this vessel is impeding the mesh fixation.…”
Introduction and hypothesis
In addition to laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LS), laparoscopic pectopexy (LP) is a novel surgical method for correcting apical prolapse. The descended cervix or vaginal vault is suspended with a synthetic mesh by fixing the bilateral mesh ends to the pectineal ligaments. This study was aimed at developing a learning curve for LP and to compare it with results with LS.
Methods
We started laparoscopic/robotic pectopexy in our department in August 2019. This retrospective study included the initial 18 consecutive women with apical prolapse receiving LP and another group undergoing LS (21 cases) performed by the same surgeon. The medical and video records were reviewed.
Results
The age was older in the LP group than in the LS group (65.2 vs 53.1 years). The operation time of LP group was significantly shorter than that of the LS group (182.9 ± 27.2 vs 256.2 ± 45.5 min, p < 0.001). The turning point of the LP learning curve was observed at the 12th case. No major complications such as bladder, ureteral, bowel injury or uncontrolled bleeding occurred in either group. Postoperative low back pain and defecation symptoms occurred exclusively in the LS group. During the follow-up period (mean 7.2 months in LP, 16.2 months in LS), none of the cases had recurrent apical prolapse.
Conclusions
Laparoscopic pectopexy is a feasible surgical method for apical prolapse, with a shorter operation time and less postoperative discomfort than LS. LP may overcome the steep learning curve of LS because the surgical field of LP is limited to the anterior pelvis and avoids encountering the critical organs.
“…2 g). A cadaver study showed that the mean distance from the midpoint of the pectineal ligament to the external iliac vein was 1.04–1.25 cm and to the obturator canal was 3.12–3.57 cm [ 15 ]. The obturator nerve passes below the pectineal ligament and is relatively distant from the dissection plane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A vessel that may be encountered during pectineal ligament preparation is the pubic vein, also called the corona mortis (Fig. 2 h), which is the anastomosis of the external iliac vein and obturator vein and lies on the pectineal ligament [ 15 ]. It can simply be cauterized if this vessel is impeding the mesh fixation.…”
Introduction and hypothesis
In addition to laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LS), laparoscopic pectopexy (LP) is a novel surgical method for correcting apical prolapse. The descended cervix or vaginal vault is suspended with a synthetic mesh by fixing the bilateral mesh ends to the pectineal ligaments. This study was aimed at developing a learning curve for LP and to compare it with results with LS.
Methods
We started laparoscopic/robotic pectopexy in our department in August 2019. This retrospective study included the initial 18 consecutive women with apical prolapse receiving LP and another group undergoing LS (21 cases) performed by the same surgeon. The medical and video records were reviewed.
Results
The age was older in the LP group than in the LS group (65.2 vs 53.1 years). The operation time of LP group was significantly shorter than that of the LS group (182.9 ± 27.2 vs 256.2 ± 45.5 min, p < 0.001). The turning point of the LP learning curve was observed at the 12th case. No major complications such as bladder, ureteral, bowel injury or uncontrolled bleeding occurred in either group. Postoperative low back pain and defecation symptoms occurred exclusively in the LS group. During the follow-up period (mean 7.2 months in LP, 16.2 months in LS), none of the cases had recurrent apical prolapse.
Conclusions
Laparoscopic pectopexy is a feasible surgical method for apical prolapse, with a shorter operation time and less postoperative discomfort than LS. LP may overcome the steep learning curve of LS because the surgical field of LP is limited to the anterior pelvis and avoids encountering the critical organs.
“…Pulatoglu et al measured the total length of the pectineal ligament -5.9±0.76 cm on the left and 6.5±1.14 cm on the right side. From the midpoint of the right pectineal ligament, the mean distance to the right CMOR was 2.37±0.63 cm and the mean distance to the left CMOR was 2.15±0.48 cm [44].…”
Section: Clinical Applications Of Aovs Acovs and Cmor In Gynecologymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…the external iliac vessels and the pubic spine [43].They reported that during Burch colposuspension stitches should be located near to the iliac vessels and 4 cm lateral to the medial insertion of the ligament, where it has its greatest thickness [43]. According to other study, the medial part of pectineal ligament close to the pubic tubercle was the thickest section and it became thinner while extending laterally [44]. In a study of 11 female unembalmed female cadavers, Kinman et al reported that the mean distance from the most lateral stitch in Cooper's pubic ligament to the obturator bundle was 25.9 ± 7.6 mm and to the external iliac vessels was 28.9 ± 9.3 mm, and in some instances, these structures were less than 15 mm away [39].…”
Section: Clinical Applications Of Aovs Acovs and Cmor In Gynecologymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, AOVs, ACOVs and CMOR are at risk of damaged during operations for vaginal wall descent, uterovaginal prolapse and neovaginal reconstruction [42,44]. Studies reported that pectopexy for pelvic organ prolapse is feasible procedure because the surgeon used a wide area in the pelvis and the strong nature of the pectineal ligament would decrease the postoperative recurrence rates [44,46]. The pectineal ligament is the target for neovaginal attachment in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.…”
Section: Clinical Applications Of Aovs Acovs and Cmor In Gynecologymentioning
Corona mortis " (CMOR) is a heterogeneous and often dubious term that causes much confusion in medical literature, especially in regard to its modern day significance in pelvic surgery. Some authors define CMOR as any abnormal anastomotic vessel between the external iliac and obturator vessels, whereas others define it as any vessel coursing over the superior pubic branch, regardless whether it is a vascular anastomosis, an accessory obturator vessels, an obturator vessel related to the external iliac system or a terminal small vessel. There is no standard classification of CMOR and obturator vessels variations, although there are multitudes of classifications describing the diverse variations in the obturator foramen region. We define accessory obturator, aberrant obturator vessels and CMOR as different structures, as CMOR is an anatomical term that reflects a clinical situation rather than an anatomical structure. A new clinical classification for aberrant, accessory obturator vessels and CMOR is proposed regarding the anatomical variations, and the location of vessels to the deep femoral ring. The clinical significance of accessory obturator, aberrant vessels and CMOR is delineated in oncogynecological and urogynecological surgery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.