2015 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2015.0462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface acoustic wave accelerometer for high-G applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The keynote advantage of the SAW-based accelerometers is the absence of any moving parts in their design, which could potentially make them extremely shock, vibration and temperature resistant. Recent literature data based solely on the results of computer simulations predict potential values up to several-dozen g [ 23 , 24 ], while no experimental confirmation has been provided. Although rather simple physical models describing the SAW accelerometer dynamics do not limit their shock or vibrational resistance, we understand that most likely the limiting factors would come from secondary effects such as fabrication precision, potential sensor element asymmetry, inhomogeneity of raw materials and so on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The keynote advantage of the SAW-based accelerometers is the absence of any moving parts in their design, which could potentially make them extremely shock, vibration and temperature resistant. Recent literature data based solely on the results of computer simulations predict potential values up to several-dozen g [ 23 , 24 ], while no experimental confirmation has been provided. Although rather simple physical models describing the SAW accelerometer dynamics do not limit their shock or vibrational resistance, we understand that most likely the limiting factors would come from secondary effects such as fabrication precision, potential sensor element asymmetry, inhomogeneity of raw materials and so on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2015, Wang et al designed a SAW accelerometer based on ST-X quartz cantilever beam and achieved a frequency sensitivity of 29.7 kHz g −1 , a good linearity and a lower detection limit of ∼1 × 10 −4 g [20]. In 2015, Lukyanov et al designed a differential SAW accelerometer with two SAW-resonators placed to the opposite sides of the console, aiming to achieve high vibration and shock resistances, and finite element analysis predicted a measurement range of 50 ∼ 65 000 g and a sensitivity of only 0.2 Hz g −1 [21]. In 2018, Shevchenko et al developed another SAW accelerometer with a high sensitivity of about 14.62 kHz g −1 but with a poor detection range of only ±2 g [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2015, they further developed a SAW acceleration sensor incorporating ST-X quartz cantilever beam, achieving a high sensitivity up to 29.7 kHz g −1 , with a good linearity and a high resolution [12]. In 2015, Lukyanov et al and designed the console of SAW accelerometer, making it able to survive extreme impact (50 g ∼ 65,000 g) with a sensitivity of 0.2 Hz g −1 [13]. In 2020, Shevchenko et al proposed a novel sensitive element using aluminum nitride membrane for acceleration measurement, and achieved a sensitivity of 43 Hz g −1 [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%