2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2019.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supremacy of Auditory Versus Visual Input in Somatic Empathy and Perceived Pain Level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we measured EEG from the observer and cardiac and skin conductance responses from both members of the dyad. Contrary to our hypothesis, we found that the reduced level of intimacy in mediated compared to direct interactions did not diminish empathic accuracy (Agahi & Wanic, 2020;Jospe et al, 2020;Zaki et al, 2009a). While pain empathy did not modulate mu suppression, theta responses to another's pain were reduced in mediated interactions.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, we measured EEG from the observer and cardiac and skin conductance responses from both members of the dyad. Contrary to our hypothesis, we found that the reduced level of intimacy in mediated compared to direct interactions did not diminish empathic accuracy (Agahi & Wanic, 2020;Jospe et al, 2020;Zaki et al, 2009a). While pain empathy did not modulate mu suppression, theta responses to another's pain were reduced in mediated interactions.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the story-based paradigm, our results imply that visual information (apparent in both the direct interaction and the video calls) is sufficient for empathic accuracy for others’ pain. As our participants did not experience severe pain (expressed by moaning or crying), auditory information might have been less important than for example in empathic responses to the pain of hospital patients (Agahi & Wanic, 2020). As our control analysis showed no condition differences in target expressivity, we can be assured that these did not mask true condition differences in empathic accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation