1961
DOI: 10.1097/00005053-196103000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suggestibility With and Without “Induction of Hypnosis”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
3

Year Published

1964
1964
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
39
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the situational correlates, the data indicate that the hypnotic induction procedure typically increases suggestibility significantly; the gain is, however, smaller than it is generally believed (Hull, 1933;Weitzenhoffer and Sjöberg, 1961;Hilgard and Tart, 1966;Tart and Hilgard, 1966). Barber and Glass (1962) maintained that with motivational manipulations it is possible to reach the same amount of increase as with a hypnotic induction.…”
Section: Correlates Of Hypnotizabilitymentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the situational correlates, the data indicate that the hypnotic induction procedure typically increases suggestibility significantly; the gain is, however, smaller than it is generally believed (Hull, 1933;Weitzenhoffer and Sjöberg, 1961;Hilgard and Tart, 1966;Tart and Hilgard, 1966). Barber and Glass (1962) maintained that with motivational manipulations it is possible to reach the same amount of increase as with a hypnotic induction.…”
Section: Correlates Of Hypnotizabilitymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…response to suggestions after a hypnotic induction) is the responsiveness to suggestions without a hypnotic induction (see e.g. Weitzenhoffer and Sjöberg, 1961;Hilgard, 1965;Hilgard and Tart, 1966).…”
Section: Correlates Of Hypnotizabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conundrum centers on findings indicating that the induction of hypnosis has little impact on responsiveness to suggestion and that hypnotizability scales, therefore, probably measure the effects of suggestion, not the effects of hypnosis (cf. Barber & Glass, 1962;Braffman & Kirsch, 1999Caster & Baker, 1932;Glass & Barber, 1961;Weitzenhoffer & Sjoberg, 1961;Williams, 1930).…”
Section: Response To Torem Suggestion Undefined: On the Limitations Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypothesis that hallucinations and other exceptional phenomena can be elicited without a hypnotic trance state is precisely what nonstate theorists propose, and self-report data are consistent with that hypothesis. Subjects who have not been hypnotized report experi-Kirsch encing suggested hallucinations (Weitzenhoffer and Sjoberg, 1961;Barber and Glass, 1962;Hilgard and Tart, 1966;Braffman and Kirsch, 1999). If these subjects are not lying, one should be able to find corresponding increases in activation at the neural level, and these would suggest that a trance state is not a necessary causal factor.…”
Section: Assessing Responses To Suggested Hallucinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%