Sugars and satiety: does the type of sweetener make a difference?

Monsivais, Pablo; Perrigue, Martine M.; Drewnowski, Adam

doi:10.1093/ajcn/86.1.116

Cited by 42 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In our study, the difference in perceived fullness and satisfaction between the skim milk and fruit drink treatments became larger over time (as evidenced by significant time-by-treatment interactions), which suggests that a difference in energy intake may not have been observed had the test meal been provided much sooner than 4 h after the beverages. Furthermore, other studies providing isoenergetic dairy or sugarbased liquid preloads have reported no difference in energy intake at a test meal provided 1 h later (11,12), 2 h later (14,21), or at the same time as the preload (13).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Skim milk compared with a fruit drink acutely reduces appetite and energy intake in overweight men and women

Dove

Hodgson

Puddey

et al. 2009

The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Several studies show that proteins, including whey and casein, are more satiating than carbohydrates. It follows that skim milk would be more satiating than sugar-rich beverages. However, this has yet to be shown. Objective: The objective was to investigate the effects of drinking skim milk in comparison with a fruit drink at breakfast on selfreported postmeal satiety and energy intake at lunch. Design: In a randomized crossover trial, 34 overweight women (n = 21) and men (n = 13) attended 2 sessions 1 wk apart. At each session, participants consumed a fixed-energy breakfast together with either 600 mL skim milk (25 g protein, 36 g lactose, ,1 g fat; 1062 kJ) or 600 mL fruit drink (,1 g protein, 63 g sugar, ,1 g fat; '1062 kJ). Participants provided satiety ratings throughout the morning. Four hours after breakfast they consumed an ad libitum lunch, and energy intake was assessed. Results: Participants consumed significantly less energy at lunch after consuming skim milk (mean: 2432 kJ; 95% CI: 2160, 2704 kJ) than after consuming the fruit drink (mean: 2658 kJ; 95% CI: 2386, 2930 kJ), with a mean difference of '8.5% (P , 0.05). In addition, self-reports of satiety were higher throughout the morning after consumption of skim milk than after consumption of the fruit drink (P , 0.05) with the differences becoming larger over the 4 h (P , 0.05). Conclusion: Consumption of skim milk, in comparison with a fruit drink, leads to increased perceptions of satiety and to decreased energy intake at a subsequent meal. This trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry at www.anzctr.org. au as ACTRN12608000510347.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Skim milk compared with a fruit drink acutely reduces appetite and energy intake in overweight men and women

Dove

Hodgson

Puddey

et al. 2009

The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…77 Another study showed that drinks that were sweetened with either sucrose or HFCS did not have significantly different effects on hunger, satiety or on energy intake at a subsequent lunch. 78 In the absence of long term studies on the effects of HFCS versus sucrose, it seems premature to blame the switch to HFCS as a major contributor to the pathogenesis of obesity or cardiovascular diseases.…”

Section: The Role Of Caffeine In Soft Drinksmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sugary drinks in the pathogenesis of obesity and cardiovascular diseases

Dulloo

2008

Int J Obes

114

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Soft drink overconsumption is now considered to be a major public health concern with implications for cardiovascular diseases. This follows a number of studies performed in animals suggesting that chronic consumption of refined sugars can contribute to metabolic and cardiovascular dysregulation. In particular, the monosaccharide fructose has been attracting increasing attention as the more harmful sugar component in terms of weight gain and metabolic disturbances. High-fructose corn syrup is gradually replacing sucrose as the main sweetener in soft drinks and has been blamed as a potential contributor to the current high prevalence of obesity. There is also considerable evidence that fructose, rather than glucose, is the more damaging sugar component in terms of cardiovascular risk. This review focuses on the potential role of sugar drinks, particularly the fructose component, in the pathogenesis of obesity and cardiovascular diseases.

show abstract

“…Unlike fiber, simple sugars provide little satiating effect, which can foster excessive energy intake [16]. However, studies that have examined the differences between the regulatory mechanisms of satiety of various types of fructose-containing sugar such as sucrose, fructose and high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) did not come to conclusive results [17,18]. Researchers assume that these rapidly absorbed carbohydrates may cause a higher glycemic load, which would be associated with greater insulin response and thus an increased risk of fat accumulation [19,20].…”

Section: Added Sugar and Its Potential Hazardsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is Sugar the new Tobacco? Insights from Laboratory Studies, Consumer Surveys and Public Health

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the Americas, mean energy intake from added sugar exceeds recent World Health Organization recommendations for free sugars in the diet. As a leading contributor to this excess, sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) overconsumption represents a risk for the population's health. This article provides an overview of clinical and epidemiological evidence, marketing practices, corporate influence and prevention strategies related to added sugar and SSB. For each aspect of this multidimensional profile, we briefly compare SSB to the case of tobacco pointing to similarities but also major differences. Tobacco control has demonstrated the effectiveness of long term multifaceted prevention strategies in multiple settings supported by strong public policies which may be applied to the consumption of SSB. However, translating these policies to the specific case of SSB is urgently needed, to inform preventive actions, decide which intervention mix will be used, and evaluate the process and impact of the chosen strategy.

show abstract

Sugars and satiety: does the type of sweetener make a difference?

Abstract: There was no evidence that commercial cola beverages sweetened with either sucrose or HFCS have significantly different effects on hunger, satiety, or short-term energy intakes.

Cited by 42 publications

References 28 publications

Skim milk compared with a fruit drink acutely reduces appetite and energy intake in overweight men and women

Skim milk compared with a fruit drink acutely reduces appetite and energy intake in overweight men and women

Sugary drinks in the pathogenesis of obesity and cardiovascular diseases

Is Sugar the new Tobacco? Insights from Laboratory Studies, Consumer Surveys and Public Health

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About