2014
DOI: 10.1186/s12917-014-0282-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Successional changes in the chicken cecal microbiome during 42 days of growth are independent of organic acid feed additives

Abstract: BackgroundPoultry remains a major source of foodborne bacterial infections. A variety of additives with presumed anti-microbial and/or growth-promoting effects are commonly added to poultry feed during commercial grow-out, yet the effects of these additives on the gastrointestinal microbial community (the GI microbiome) as the bird matures remain largely unknown. Here we compared temporal changes in the cecal microbiome to the effects of formic acid, propionic acid, and medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA) added to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
107
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
14
107
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Trial 1 revealed less variation while Trial 2 revealed significant increases ( P < 0.05) at 28 and 42 days compared to 14 days (data not shown). Increasing cecal microbiota complexity that directly relates to sampling age has been observed in previous studies on poultry intestinal microbiota characterization (Salanitro et al, 1974; Danzeisen et al, 2013; Oakley et al, 2014). Meimandipour et al (2011) provided evidence for this based on the variation in the production of SCFA observed in the ceca across various sampling ages.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Trial 1 revealed less variation while Trial 2 revealed significant increases ( P < 0.05) at 28 and 42 days compared to 14 days (data not shown). Increasing cecal microbiota complexity that directly relates to sampling age has been observed in previous studies on poultry intestinal microbiota characterization (Salanitro et al, 1974; Danzeisen et al, 2013; Oakley et al, 2014). Meimandipour et al (2011) provided evidence for this based on the variation in the production of SCFA observed in the ceca across various sampling ages.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…What has been recognized in the current research along with previous work is that feed supplements, aside from vitamins (Luo et al, 2013), thus far appear to have little general impact on the composition of the cecal microbiome (Danzeisen et al, 2013; Oakley et al, 2014). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…These findings appear to be consistent with a previous study in which artificially inoculated Salmonella in the broiler caecal microbiome decreased from 21 to 42 days of age (Oakley et al . ). Furthermore, Salmonella isolation from caecal and environmental samples was highly correlated (Table S2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…; Oakley et al . ). To date, however, molecular epidemiological data to elucidate these temporal fluctuations for naturally contaminated broiler flocks in Japan have not been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A total of 9 and 13 classes, 11 and 17 orders, 18 and 40 families, and 30 and 87 genera were identified on days 1 and 35, respectively. Oakley et al [2014] analyzed the changes in the chicken cecal microbiome during 42 days of growth and reported that the cecal bacterial community changed significantly and taxonomic richness and diversity at the genus level increased through growth time. In a similar way, Danzeisen et al [2011] examined the effects of the growth promoter virginiamycin and tylosin on the broiler chicken cecal microbiome and metagenome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%