Suburbanization in the USA, 1970–2010

Abstract

The second half of the 20th century saw large‐scale suburbanization in the USA, with the median share of residents who work in the county where they live falling from 87% to 71% between 1970 and 2000. We introduce a new methodology for discriminating between the three leading explanations for this suburbanization (workplace attractiveness, residence attractiveness and bilateral commuting frictions). This methodology holds in the class of spatial models that are characterized by a structural gravity equation for commuting. We show that the increased openness of counties to commuting is explained mainly by reductions in bilateral commuting frictions, consistent with the expansion of the interstate highway network and the falling real cost of car ownership. We find that changes in workplace attractiveness and residence attractiveness are more important in explaining the observed shift in employment by workplace and employment by residence towards lower densities over time.

Local development, metropolitan sustainability and the urbanization-suburbanization nexus in the Mediterranean region: A quantitative exercise

“…Standardized tPLS axis scores by year; three-years moving average of the score difference between 'periphery' and 'inner city' (a: Axis 1; b: Axis 2; c: Axis 3); the horizontal line estimates a balanced path of metropolitan development. Mason, 2010;Redding, 2022). As a matter of fact, metropolitan development mixed the 'traditional' sequence of urbanization-suburbanization waves (rather well delineated and predicted in the City Life Cycle theory) with counter-intuitive, reverse dynamics reflecting suburbanization (Tian & Mao, 2022).…”

To move or not to move? The housing preferences of a post-socialist city in the suburbanisation stage

“…Within the city, the relocation of residents between the centre and the suburbs depends on the urban life cycle (Hall 1971, Klaassen et al 1981, Roberts 1991, Champion 2001, Redding 2022. The main factor of suburbanisation lies in the income level, which affects the ability to relocate outside the city's core.…”

The Way Toward Growth: A Time-series Factor Decomposition of Socioeconomic Impulses and Urbanization Trends in a Pre-crisis European Region

“…Cuberes, 2011;Sànchez-Vidal et al, 2014;Sheng et al, 2014). On the contrary, metropolitan complexity re ecting less simplistic development paths justi es an in-depth analysis of multi-domain indicators (Redding, 2022). This analysis is increasingly required to investigate together socioeconomic and territorial dimensions of regional growth and change (Oppio et al, 2018;Walker, 2018;Wang and Dong, 2022), going beyond the evidence grounded on a quantitative analysis of individual indicators (Zanella et al, 2015;Delmelle et al, 2021;Fernandez and Hartt, 2021).…”