Subjective Proximity to Crime or Social Representations? Explaining Sentencing Attitudes in Switzerland

Abstract

Lay sentencing attitudes are considered in the light of two theoretical perspectives. The first perspective views sentencing attitudes as parts of broader sets of social representations anchored in one's position in the social structure. The second perspective explains sentencing attitudes by their subjective experiences of crime. This paper tests both theories by performing a series of multiple regressions on two dimensions of sentencing: punishment goals and severity of punishment. Empirical data comes from a quantitative survey conducted in Switzerland. Findings reveal that indicators of subjective proximity to crime largely account for sentencing attitudes. Nevertheless, social representations of crime measured by causes of crime also have a significant impact on sentencing attitudes. Implications of these findings for sentencing in Western democracies are discussed.

A Typology of Ideological Attitudes Towards Social Solidarity and Social Control

“…In addition to one's location in the social structure, perceived social reality consists of an experiential dimension related to lived or perceived insecurity (Duckitt & Fisher, ; Hammer, Widmer, & Robert, ; Jackson, ). We differentiate between physical and social insecurity.…”

Strafeinstellungen und Strafpraxis in Zeiten von Revisionen des Sanktionenrechts: Analysen zur Schweiz

“…Jurastu-dierende müssen zudem als spezifische Gruppe betrachtet werden, die möglicherweise »moralisch rigider« ist (Kunz u. a. 2014, 4) (Killias 1989;Reuband 2007;Hammer, Widmer & Robert 2009).…”