2006
DOI: 10.1145/1164394.1164400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying the current status of technology adoption

Abstract: Examining the extent and nature of adoption of technologies by micro, small, and medium-sized manufacturing firms in the greater Boston area.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, conceiving phase is not been included as they already decided the proposed technology and applications to be acquired. Further, the results aligned with previous studies on SMEs that the top management is the champion of the strategic IS planning process in which they have the power to make the decision related to the overall organization [14,15]. The users will only decide on the specific applications to be used in their respective department.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Therefore, conceiving phase is not been included as they already decided the proposed technology and applications to be acquired. Further, the results aligned with previous studies on SMEs that the top management is the champion of the strategic IS planning process in which they have the power to make the decision related to the overall organization [14,15]. The users will only decide on the specific applications to be used in their respective department.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Areas researched include the opportunities created by this new medium for small firms such as international market access, increased visibility and improved domestic market performance (Lefebvre et al, 2005;Coviello and McAuley, 1999;Keogh et al, 1998) as well as the barriers such as the lack of financial and non-financial resources, lack of the appropriate skills, under investment in staff training and poor knowledge of the Internet start up process (Lefebvre et al, 2005;Fillis and Wagner, 2007 ). To a lesser extent there has been a focus on the factors that affect the adoption of technological innovations including the Internet by SMEs (Bengtsson et al 2007;Bharati and Chaudhury, 2006;Lynskey, 2004).…”
Section: The Business Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In small size businesses usually the owner or manager makes the innovation adoption decision and thus his/her characteristics impact his/her receptiveness to change. Table 3.5 illustrates commonly researched individual factors from both organizational (Thong, 1999;Sultan and Chan, 2000) and consumer adoption literature (Lockett & Littler, 1997;Kimberly & Evanisko, 1981;Brancheau & Wetherbe, 1990) (Rogers & Shoemaker, 1971;Kimberly &Evanisko, 1981), some researchers found a non significant relationship between these two variables (Lockett & Littler, 1997 Bengtsson et al , 2007;Doherty et al, 2003;Beatty et al, 2001;Bharati and Chaudhury, 2006;Premkumar & Roberts, 1999;Corbitt, 2000;Sultan &Chan, 2000;Cragg &King, 1993;Grover & Goslar, 1993. Top management support is important for creating a supportive climate and providing the required resources for the adoption of new technology (Premkumar & Roberts, 1999 Thong, 1999;Yu, 2006;Teo and Ranganathan, 2004. These studies provided valuable insights into the importance of studying individual characteristics when the adopter unit is an organization. This is because the adoption decision is made by individuals within organizations whose characteristics do affect the adoption decision.…”
Section: Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations