Studying risk governance using a design perspective

Cedergren, Alexander; Tehler, Henrik

doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.03.006

Cited by 22 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 32 publications

(35 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…More and more, claims to know what constitutes a risk and what constitutes an appropriate regulatory response are disputed. Often, a distinction is made between “objective” and “perceived” risks (Cedergren & Tehler, 2014). Over recent decades, scholars have put to the test the objectivity of technical risk assessments and have identified a range of biases and ethical and sociocultural influences that affect risk identification and estimation (Rosa, 1998; Viscusi & Zeckhauser, 2015).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk as an Approach to Regulatory Governance: An Evidence Synthesis and Research Agenda

Heijden

2021

SAGE Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Governments around the world have begun to develop and implement risk governance and risk-based regulation and are often inspired by the insights from risk studies in doing so. Following these developments, scholars have begun to map, explore, and interrogate risk governance models and strategies and risk-based regulatory approaches and instruments, and their performance. This article presents an evidence of academic literature on risk as an approach to regulatory governance. It follows the logic and applies tools of meta-research, a systematic and replicable process of synthesizing research findings across a body of original research. Following a staged approach, 135 peer-reviewed journal articles from an initial body of 1,125 articles were analyzed. The article presents the main findings from the evidence synthesis, presents the gaps in our knowledge, and suggests a future agenda for research on risk as an approach to regulatory governance. The article finds that despite ongoing conceptual and normative debates about the need for risk governance and risk-based regulation, we lack a good understanding of how it operates in practice. Future scholarship is urged to be critical of the potential gap between academic and policy rhetoric on risk-based regulatory governance and the application of this approach to regulatory governance on the ground.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk as an Approach to Regulatory Governance: An Evidence Synthesis and Research Agenda

Heijden

2021

SAGE Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…La catégorie des technologies de l'information couvre des domaines de travail qui portent sur la cybersécurité de systèmes d'acquisition et de contrôle de données [43], les équipements de laboratoire [21], les postes informatiques [45], une tablette électronique [20] et un livre électronique [28]. La catégorie de gestion des risques couvre des domaines de travail qui portent sur la gestion des risques ferroviaires [11] et un système de gestion de crise [11]. La catégorie du médical couvre des domaines de travail qui portent sur le corps humain [14] et un système de médication à domicile [23].…”

Section: Domaines De Travailunclassified

“…Trois articles présentent quatre domaines de travail comprenant trois niveaux d'abstraction [9,11,24]. Un des articles utilise les mêmes trois niveaux d'abstraction pour deux domaines de travail [11].…”

Section: Domaines De Travailunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Systematic literature review on work domains represented by the abstraction hierarchy

Moïse

Thomaidis

Guillemette

2019

Proceedings of the 31st Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ecological interface design allows the user to cope with three types of events: (a) familiar, (b) occasional, but anticipated and (c) unexpected. To cope with unexpected events, this theoretical framework recommends starting with an analysis of the work domain and the main technique is the abstraction hierarchy (AH). However, the time and effort required to produce one remains a challenge. One solution is to develop AHs for specific work domains in order to be reused. This article presents an analysis of 32 work domains that have been represented by an AH that were selected from a systematic literature review. The results show that 11 represent industrial domains, 22 have 5 levels of abstraction and 21 represent causal systems. The results allow researchers to reuse entirely or adapt AHs from these work domains and to direct HA development towards work domains that are not covered. CCS CONCEPTS • Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI) → HCI theory, concepts and models.

show abstract

“…In investigating the usefulness of risk descriptions we have employed a design perspective (see, for example, [30,[32][33][34][35]). Thus, we consider the descriptions of risk to be artifacts, i.e., they are created by humans with a purpose in mind (as opposed to being the result of natural processes), and they must therefore be studied in relation to that purpose when analyzing their usefulness.…”

Section: Theoretical Conceptsmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the perceived usefulness of risk descriptions for decision-making in disaster risk management

Lin

Nilsson

Sjölin

et al. 2015

Reliability Engineering & System Safety

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Studying risk governance using a design perspective

Cited by 22 publications

References 32 publications

Risk as an Approach to Regulatory Governance: An Evidence Synthesis and Research Agenda

Risk as an Approach to Regulatory Governance: An Evidence Synthesis and Research Agenda

Systematic literature review on work domains represented by the abstraction hierarchy

On the perceived usefulness of risk descriptions for decision-making in disaster risk management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About