2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on surface roughness measurement for turning of Al 7075/10/SiCp and Al 7075 hybrid composites by using response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural networking (ANN)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
75
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Truly, after predicting tensile strength of friction stir welded AA7039 aluminum alloy joints, Lakshminarayanan and Balasubramanian [14], concluded that RSM has a main advantage compared with ANN, this advantage consist of its ability to quantify the factor contributions from the coefficients in the regression model, identifying the insignificant main factors and interaction factors or insignificant terms in the model. Moreover, in their comparison between ANN and RSM approaches for modeling surface roughness when turning of Al7075/10/SiCp and Al 7075 hybrid composites, Kumar and Chauhan [15], concluded that the ANN prediction model produced a greater parentage error than the RSM prediction model with (R 2 ) values of 0.99571 and 0.9972 respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Truly, after predicting tensile strength of friction stir welded AA7039 aluminum alloy joints, Lakshminarayanan and Balasubramanian [14], concluded that RSM has a main advantage compared with ANN, this advantage consist of its ability to quantify the factor contributions from the coefficients in the regression model, identifying the insignificant main factors and interaction factors or insignificant terms in the model. Moreover, in their comparison between ANN and RSM approaches for modeling surface roughness when turning of Al7075/10/SiCp and Al 7075 hybrid composites, Kumar and Chauhan [15], concluded that the ANN prediction model produced a greater parentage error than the RSM prediction model with (R 2 ) values of 0.99571 and 0.9972 respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal value obtained were 4 m/min for cutting speed, 0.1 mm/rev for feed rate and point angle 135°.Also, for achieving lower surface roughness, lower feed rate and cutting speed is preferred. The surface measurement for the Turing of Aluminium metal matrix composite with the combination of Al7075/10/SiCp was studied by Ravinder Kumar and Santram Chauhan [18] using two techniques. The cutting speed, feed and approach angle were varied within a range and the experiments were conducted.…”
Section: Fig 6 Microstructure Of Machined MMC [15]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al MMC reinforced with varying percentage by weight of SiC is considered as potential candidate material due to its light weight and improved thermo mechanical properties for brake application. This process involves a liquid state fabrication technique which requires the incorporation of reinforcing phase (discontinuous form) into a molten matrix metal (continuous form) to obtain a uniform distribution through stirring [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Selection Of Materialmentioning
confidence: 99%