2012
DOI: 10.1088/0960-1317/22/5/055006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of design parameters affecting the motion of DNA for nanoinjection

Abstract: This paper reports the effects of various parameters on the attraction and repulsion of DNA to and from a silicon lance. An understanding of DNA motion is crucial for a new approach to insert DNA, or other foreign microscopic matter, into a living cell. The approach, called nanoinjection, uses electrical forces to attract and repel the desired substance to a micromachined lance designed to pierce the cell membranes. We have developed mathematical models to predict the trajectory of DNA. The mathematical model … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation for this behavior is that 4.5 mA protocols offers the best balance between effective electrical attraction/release of the DNA during the LAN process, while being a mild stressor in terms of cell viability. Even though the 1.5 mA protocol is milder in terms of cellular stress, a feature seen in electroporation studies to improve cell viability (Canatella et al 2001 ), perhaps the 4.5 mA protocol is better at balancing the cellular stress with effective attraction and release of the DNA, a parameter shown to increase DNA motion when done at higher magnitudes in processes like electrophoresis (David et al 2010 , 2011 , 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation for this behavior is that 4.5 mA protocols offers the best balance between effective electrical attraction/release of the DNA during the LAN process, while being a mild stressor in terms of cell viability. Even though the 1.5 mA protocol is milder in terms of cellular stress, a feature seen in electroporation studies to improve cell viability (Canatella et al 2001 ), perhaps the 4.5 mA protocol is better at balancing the cellular stress with effective attraction and release of the DNA, a parameter shown to increase DNA motion when done at higher magnitudes in processes like electrophoresis (David et al 2010 , 2011 , 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microinjection is also reported as being relatively effective and having low toxicity, but it is laborious and time intensive since cells are injected one at a time. Nanoinjection combines mechanical and electrical methods and has relatively high viability and efficiency [3][4][5][6][7][8]. However, the original nanoinjection system is also limited to single cell injections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%