1966
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.149.965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies of Fragment Angular Distributions in the Fission ofBi209andU238

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. These are in good agreement with the trends of lower energy work [10][11][12]. In Table 1 the values for the laboratory and center-of-mass anisotropies are listed along with the corresponding transformation parameters.…”
Section: II Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2. These are in good agreement with the trends of lower energy work [10][11][12]. In Table 1 the values for the laboratory and center-of-mass anisotropies are listed along with the corresponding transformation parameters.…”
Section: II Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Thus, it would appear that the results of Ref. 10, which led to the suggestion of a possible transition in the saddle point deformation from the second maximum to the liquid drop barrier, may be more an artifact of the reaction mechanism than of the fission process itself. The present work suggests that in order to extract meaningful ~eff values for fissioning systems-which would be very desirable, especially at low xj.…”
Section: Comparison Of the K~/(e~) ~ Values For 4he-ion-in-197mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Umezawa et al [4] have given a prescription for the calculation of the most probable charge (Zp) for the actinides. Though this method is not suitable for pre-actinides and as no other empirical analysis or data exits for pre-actinides, it was used to calculate the Zp values (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparisons in Table I demonstrate The agreement between the various types of data in Table I in predicting the gross features of the target-projectile interaction suggests that the interaction radius concept can be generalized for use in predicting total reaction cross sections and maximum angular momenta for 20 Ne and 16 0 reactions with heavy elements. From the relationship ( 1) where v~z 1 z 2 e 2 /R and E is the center-of-mas energy of the projectile, cm an excellent fit to the experimental total reaction cross section data for 20 Ne and 16 0 bombardments of uranium above 120 MeV and 100 MeV, respectively, is obtained if one simply sets R=R. t=l2.75 fm in for 20 Ne and 12.60 fm for 16 0, as determined from the Fresnel scattering analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%