2015
DOI: 10.1080/00221309.2014.994590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stuck in the Middle: The Use and Interpretation of Mid-Points in Items on Questionnaires

Abstract: Likert-type scales are commonly used when assessing attitudes, personality characteristics, and other psychological variables. This study examined the effect of varying the number of response options on the same set of 28 attitudinal items. Participants answered items using either a 4-point scale (forced choice), a 5-point scale that included a "neither" mid-point, or a 4-point scale with an option of "no opinion" presented after the item. The questionnaire also included an item asking participants what they b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
165
0
16

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
165
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in terms of attitudes toward bisexual men and women, the majority of participants in our study remained “middle of the road” and were most likely to report neither agreeing nor disagreeing with the range of sentiments and stereotypes embedded within the BIAS items. These responses can be interpreted in a variety of ways, including the participant not knowing, the participant being unsure, or the participant not caring [47]. Additionally, mid-point responses may also reflect social desirability bias [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in terms of attitudes toward bisexual men and women, the majority of participants in our study remained “middle of the road” and were most likely to report neither agreeing nor disagreeing with the range of sentiments and stereotypes embedded within the BIAS items. These responses can be interpreted in a variety of ways, including the participant not knowing, the participant being unsure, or the participant not caring [47]. Additionally, mid-point responses may also reflect social desirability bias [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respuesta socialmente deseable (RSD): es la tendencia a responder de la manera que se espera que sea mejor vista por los demás. Se puede entender como una forma de deseabilidad social (Nadler, Weston y Voyles, 2015).…”
Section: Categorías Temáticas O Tópicosunclassified
“…En los estudios se llega a la conclusión de que la opción SO/NS es socialmente menos deseable que la alternativa intermedia (Johns, 2005;Nadler, Weston y Voyles, 2015). Así, cuando el encuestado no comprende el ítem, y además no se dispone de la opción SO/NS, la persona que contesta puede plantearse tres escenarios (Velez y Ashworth, 2007):…”
Section: Categorías Temáticas O Tópicosunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ressalta-se também um dos inconvenientes da utilização da escala de Likert com cinco níveis, visto que é comum nesse tipo de escala que muitos respondentes optem por não dar uma resposta nem positiva, nem negativa, principalmente quando se trata de expressar opinião sobre ambiente de trabalho, envolvendo direta ou indiretamente as ações dos superiores (Mattar, 2014). Uma alternativa seria adotar a escala Likert de quatro pontos, porém, seria preciso analisar com mais cuidado suas vantagens e desvantagens, pois há autores que a defendem (Garland, 1991;Nadler;Weston;Voyles, 2015), enquanto outros indicam a possibilidade de gerar distorções (Worcester;Burns, 1975). Outra opção seria apostar em uma escala de 11 pontos, pois os resultados seriam mais próximos de uma curva normal (Leung, 2011).…”
Section: Conclusãounclassified