2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-31362-3_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structuring a Multicriteria Model to Optimize the Profitability of a Clinical Laboratory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Making everyday decisions involving everyday life becomes more complicated, as it is necessary to solve the problem, taking into account different perspectives and evaluating according to the specific form of the problem and, thus, a set of alternative solutions can be considered multiple criteria conflicting with each other ( [18] and [19]). This line of reasoning [20,21] confirms that before choosing two alternative actions, the choice of a multi-criteria decision problem is motivated by the desire to satisfy multiple, often conflicting objectives.…”
Section: Support Multi-criteria Decisionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Making everyday decisions involving everyday life becomes more complicated, as it is necessary to solve the problem, taking into account different perspectives and evaluating according to the specific form of the problem and, thus, a set of alternative solutions can be considered multiple criteria conflicting with each other ( [18] and [19]). This line of reasoning [20,21] confirms that before choosing two alternative actions, the choice of a multi-criteria decision problem is motivated by the desire to satisfy multiple, often conflicting objectives.…”
Section: Support Multi-criteria Decisionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Figure S13A shows that PBS-treated tumors show almost a slight increase in temperature (less than 37 °C at 5 min) under the same NIR light irradiation, while the maximum temperatures of the tumor in the DiR@Lipo group and combination therapy group after the first irradiation are both about 50 °C, showing a significant rapid temperature rise (Figure S13B,C). To quantify the photothermal effect in vivo, we also calculate the cumulative equivalent minutes at 50 °C (CEM50) 82 for the DiR@Lipo+Laser group and DiR@Lipo+GOx@Lipo+Laser group, which are 4.71 ± 1.37 and 2.63 ± 1.02 min, respectively (Table S2). Although the photothermal curves are similar for the two groups, the former group receives slightly more heat than the latter group.…”
Section: Acs Biomaterials Science and Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pesquisa pode ser descrita como um estudo de caso que teve um laboratório de análises clínicas de e permitindo a determinação de seus descritores com base no mapa cognitivo construído [4], [5].…”
Section: Delineando Problemas E Propondo Soluçõesunclassified