2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structured light-based height control for laser metal deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage over a laser line scanning system is that the measurement can be made from an external fixed position without the need to introduce an extra movement, which adds complexity to the system and decreases its accuracy. The developed control strategy complements the work in [28], where a height control strategy based on the recalculation of the deposition trajectories according to the mean height of the previously deposited layer was presented. This paper presents a novel methodology to apply local corrections within the layer, based on the dynamic variation of the scanning speed as a function of the height of each region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The advantage over a laser line scanning system is that the measurement can be made from an external fixed position without the need to introduce an extra movement, which adds complexity to the system and decreases its accuracy. The developed control strategy complements the work in [28], where a height control strategy based on the recalculation of the deposition trajectories according to the mean height of the previously deposited layer was presented. This paper presents a novel methodology to apply local corrections within the layer, based on the dynamic variation of the scanning speed as a function of the height of each region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In order to perform the mean height correction considering the geometry of the part and the scanned data, the same procedure was used as in Reference [28], where the CAD model, in STL format, of the complete part was sliced from the mean measured height to the next height to be reached after deposition of the following layer (Figure 2b). As in this work, only one layer was deposited between scans and the height of the volume to be deposited corresponded to the theoretical layer height.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As concerning off-axis monitoring systems, recently Garmendia et al [ 25 ] proposed a closed-loop control system that allowed the adjustment of the height of the deposited layer and recalculate the deposition paths during repositioning. The monitoring was performed using a structured light scanner.…”
Section: Review Of Main In-situ Monitoring Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I. Garmendia et al [17], [18] use a structured light-based 3D scanner to measure the height profile of the part from a fixed position relative to the build platform, arguing that this measurement method would be more precise than strapping a sensor to a robot moving over the part surface in a scanning pattern. A depth image was captured in-situ after a pre-set number of layers were built and a control strategy that added or deleted layers, based on current build height and information from the CAD model, was used.…”
Section: B Closed-loop In Dedmentioning
confidence: 99%