2021
DOI: 10.3390/ma14030673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coaxial Monitoring of AISI 316L Thin Walls Fabricated by Direct Metal Laser Deposition

Abstract: Direct metal laser deposition (DMLD) is an additive manufacturing technique suitable for coating and repair, which has been gaining a growing interest in 3D manufacturing applications in recent years. However, its diffusion in the manufacturing industry is still limited due to technical challenges to be solved—both the sub-optimal quality of the final parts and the low repeatability of the process make the DMLD inadequate for high-value applications requiring high-performance standards. Thus, real-time monitor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The described attributes distinguish the method presented in this work from other coaxial monitoring systems of laser welding processes. It has been described that coaxial camera monitoring can be used to assess melt pool expansion within the process [23]. However, a topography of the final weld bead cannot be extracted using this method, which means that defects such as pores or similar phenomena can remain hidden from the measurements, which makes the coaxial integration of a camera for melt pool control another indirect process monitoring solution.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The described attributes distinguish the method presented in this work from other coaxial monitoring systems of laser welding processes. It has been described that coaxial camera monitoring can be used to assess melt pool expansion within the process [23]. However, a topography of the final weld bead cannot be extracted using this method, which means that defects such as pores or similar phenomena can remain hidden from the measurements, which makes the coaxial integration of a camera for melt pool control another indirect process monitoring solution.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the laser beam moves, the molten material cools rapidly due to the heat transfer towards the substrate. The solidification front rapidly advances leaving a semi-circular section track of solidified material [15,16]. The quality of the final parts produced by DLMD, in terms of dimensional accuracy and surface regularity, is strongly affected by many process parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig 16. Comparison between calculated (solid line) and measured (dotted line) values of the clad width…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Sörn Ocylok et al [24] monitored the effect of main process parameters (laser power, feed rate, powder mass flow) with camera based co axial monitoring system and reported laser power to be the most influential characteristic in defining melt pool size. Vito Errico et al [25] monitored the melt pool geometry via coaxial monitoring system and used image algorithm to depict the melt pool geometry for fabrication of thin walls using different scan strategies. The literature describes the feasibility of using various monitoring systems for fabrication of thin walls via DED.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%