1992
DOI: 10.1107/s0108270191010983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of the sodium salt of 1,4,5,8-naphthalenetetracarboxylic acid 4,5-anhydride hydrate

Abstract: Abstract. Sodium hydrogen 1,3-dioxo-lH,3H-naphtho [1,8-cd]pyran-6,7-dicarboxylate hydrate, Na[CI4HsOT].H20, Mr=326.2, triclinic, P1, a = 9.520 (2), b = 9.549 (3), c = 7.860 (1) A, a = 105.88 (2), /3 = 110.29 (1), y= 100.89 (2) °, V= * To whom correspondence should be addressed.0108-2701/92/030460-06503.00 611.9 (3) A 3, Z = 2, Dx = 1.77 g cm -3, A(Mo K~) = 0.71073 A, /z = 1.67 cm i, F(000) = 332, T = 295 K, R --0.042 for 1665 unique reflections having I> 3tri. The organic portion of this structure demonstrates… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The geometric parameters of this compound are in general agreement with analogous parameters for naphthalic anhydrides reported previously (Blackburn et al, 1997;Fitzgerald et al, 1991Fitzgerald et al, , 1992.…”
Section: Commentsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The geometric parameters of this compound are in general agreement with analogous parameters for naphthalic anhydrides reported previously (Blackburn et al, 1997;Fitzgerald et al, 1991Fitzgerald et al, , 1992.…”
Section: Commentsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For the structures of naphthalene-1,4,5,8-tetracarboxylic acid 1,8-anhydride, its DMSO solvate and several metal complexes, see: Blackburn et al (1997); Fitzgerald et al (1992); Robl (1987); Xu et al (2005a,b. ) For hydrogen bonds, see: Desiraju & Steiner (1999).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fit of eqn (14) to the kinetic data in Fig. 4B was obtained using k −1 = 0.000275, k 1 = 0.00165 and K II-2 = 4 × 10 −4 (pK II-2 = 3.4), K I-H4 = K I-H2 = 3 × 10 −4 (pK I-H4 = pK I-H3 = 3.52).…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%