2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01070.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of the (110) antiphase boundary in gallium phosphide

Abstract: SummaryThe morphology of antiphase boundaries in GaP films grown by molecular beam epitaxy on Si (001) has been studied by transmission electron microscopy. The inversion of the crystal polarity between antiphase domains was confirmed by convergent-beam electron diffraction. The APBs were often found to facet parallel to {110} planes. Strong-beam α -fringe contrast observed along the (110) facets indicates that adjacent antiphase domains are related by an additional rigid-body lattice translation. Diffraction-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These could be associated with the extended ordering domains clearly seen in the high magnification image, from the double-period, lattice fringes within the defect regions. A well-known type of stacking fault, called an antiphase boundary, typical of the growth of III-V semiconductors on group IV semiconductors, e.g., GaAs/Si or GaP/Si, 8,9 does not appear to be present, consistent with the conclusions from the RHEED and LEED measurements. These involve atoms from both sublattices and have a distinct contrast for different diffraction conditions.…”
Section: A Structural Propertiessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These could be associated with the extended ordering domains clearly seen in the high magnification image, from the double-period, lattice fringes within the defect regions. A well-known type of stacking fault, called an antiphase boundary, typical of the growth of III-V semiconductors on group IV semiconductors, e.g., GaAs/Si or GaP/Si, 8,9 does not appear to be present, consistent with the conclusions from the RHEED and LEED measurements. These involve atoms from both sublattices and have a distinct contrast for different diffraction conditions.…”
Section: A Structural Propertiessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Unfortunately, there is no explicit experimental evidences of what is a preferred plane for the annihilation of APB’s in GaAs and GaP. For example, various experimental studies [10, 12,13] suggest {111}, {331}, and {113} planes for annihilation of APB’s in GaP/Si. This indicates that the APB formation energy is only one of many factors which determine favorable conditions for the APB annihilation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are believed to be formed when the growth fronts of two spatially separated nucleation sites coalesce. PL measurements (see Complementary Information) show no emission from sub-bandgap states typically associated with defects though, proving the high quality of the material.Besides the lattice mismatch, the polarity mismatch between InP and silicon could lead to additional defects through the formation of anti-phase boundaries (APBs), which can extend vertically towards the top surface 32,33 . By initiating the growth from the flat <111> Silicon planes at the bottom of the trench the formation of such anti phase-domains is prevented and the TEM images showing that the grown InP is indeed APB-free 27 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%