2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and morphology variation of solid residue from co-liquefaction of lignite and Merey atmospheric residue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ratio of the integrated areas of 2800–3000 to 1600 cm –1 ( I 1 ) and 700–900 to 1600 cm –1 ( I 2 ) were calculated to compare the relative abundance of the aliphatic and aromatic functional groups . The apparent aromaticity ( f a ) was calculated as where H/C is the hydrogen–carbon atomic ratio calculated from element content; a and b are empirical values, which were selected as 1.087 and 1.8 for coal, respectively …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ratio of the integrated areas of 2800–3000 to 1600 cm –1 ( I 1 ) and 700–900 to 1600 cm –1 ( I 2 ) were calculated to compare the relative abundance of the aliphatic and aromatic functional groups . The apparent aromaticity ( f a ) was calculated as where H/C is the hydrogen–carbon atomic ratio calculated from element content; a and b are empirical values, which were selected as 1.087 and 1.8 for coal, respectively …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where H/C is the hydrogen−carbon atomic ratio calculated from element content; a and b are empirical values, which were selected as 1.087 and 1.8 for coal, respectively. 27 2.2.2. Raman Spectroscopy.…”
Section: /A 2959cmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ash content of SR was determined in order to calculate the amount of residual carbonaceous solid. The conversion of the reaction system was evaluated by the conversion efficiency of carbonaceous solid (dry-ash-free base), hereafter referred to as the conversion efficiency based on the following equation: where m coal is the mass of coal, M is the mass of products, M ad and A ad are the percentage of the moisture and ash of coal, respectively, SR is the yield of SR, and w ash is the percentage of the ash of SR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-processing of coal and heavy oil is a new clean coal conversion technology that combines direct coal liquefaction with heavy oil hydrocracking. It not only reduces the difficulty of direct coal liquefaction but also improves the conversion efficiency of heavy oil. , Although this process can obtain a high coal conversion rate, it is accompanied by producing many solid residues. , The N content in the co-processing residue of coal and heavy oil (CR) is low, but it contains asphaltene, which is considered an ideal precursor for synthesizing functional carbon materials. The asphaltene is conducive to forming carbon skeletons via polymerization or cross-linking reactions. , The remaining iron-containing catalysts and inorganic minerals would provide iron sources for the generation of Fe–N species, which are generally considered as effective ORR active centers. , Besides, the natural minerals contained in CR could promote the formation of porous structures…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27 Although this process can obtain a high coal conversion rate, it is accompanied by producing many solid residues. 28,29 The N content in the co-processing residue of coal and heavy oil (CR) is low, but it contains asphaltene, which is considered an ideal precursor for synthesizing functional carbon materials. 30−32 The asphaltene is conducive to forming carbon skeletons via polymerization or cross-linking reactions.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%