2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Equation Model of Building Information Modeling Maturity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the project manager should check and ensure the BIM software adopted by each stakeholder compatible, and provide the uniformed data standard manual to make information flow unimpeded, for the purpose of reducing technology cost [45]. Last but not least, the integrated project team leader should select integrated project team members with rich experiences in BIM-and IPD-based projects, so as to reduce trail-and-error cost that is also believed as an important kind of proprietary cost [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the project manager should check and ensure the BIM software adopted by each stakeholder compatible, and provide the uniformed data standard manual to make information flow unimpeded, for the purpose of reducing technology cost [45]. Last but not least, the integrated project team leader should select integrated project team members with rich experiences in BIM-and IPD-based projects, so as to reduce trail-and-error cost that is also believed as an important kind of proprietary cost [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BIM research shows that there is an increasing interest among practitioners and academics to assess maturity, productivity, and performance of BIM implementation. For example, Chen et al (2016) proposed a structural equation model (SEM) of BIM maturity through multivariate analyses of data based on BIM-related professionals' experience to measure the extent to which BIM is explicitly defined, managed, integrated and optimized.…”
Section: Keyword Co-occurrence Network (Knowledge Base)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualification is often aimed at measuring anecdotes of likely success, thus, it requires measurement of various attributes that have a more holistic view of capability. The proposed criteria in this study meet this requirement since they cut across the different concepts of BIM capability attributes as theorised in previous studies (Giel & Issa, 2013), including process, people, product driven, technology or information driven criteria (Succar, 2010;Giel & Issa, 2013;Chen et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to the criteria relied on by these tools, most of the existing tools and frameworks focus on hard measures pertaining to the physical resources and processes required to deliver BIM models as opposed to other competency and organisational factors (Sebastian & van Berlo, 2010;Chen et al, 2016). Sackey (2014) described BIM capability discourse as hard technologically deterministic to the neglect of the socio-technical nature of its use in practice.…”
Section: Bim Capability Assessment Tools and Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%