2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-018-1487-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and ultrastructural differences between field, micropropagated and acclimated leaves and stems of two Leucospermum cultivars (Proteaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The abaxial leaf surface of ex vitro-acclimatized plantlets revealed a relaxed surfaces with many well-defined stomata (Figure 4a2), with a homogenous aperture, and functional guard cells with open and closed stomata (Figure 4b2). Similar results were obtained in Ceratonia siliqua [60] and Leucospermum cultivars [61]. (GGGGT) 3 G 3…”
Section: Ultra-structural Difference Between In Vitro and Acclimatize...supporting
confidence: 82%
“…The abaxial leaf surface of ex vitro-acclimatized plantlets revealed a relaxed surfaces with many well-defined stomata (Figure 4a2), with a homogenous aperture, and functional guard cells with open and closed stomata (Figure 4b2). Similar results were obtained in Ceratonia siliqua [60] and Leucospermum cultivars [61]. (GGGGT) 3 G 3…”
Section: Ultra-structural Difference Between In Vitro and Acclimatize...supporting
confidence: 82%
“…In our opinion, that structure was probably a consequence of the specific in vitro conditions. Moreover, similar morpho-and histological variations, such as a thin palisade layer and dense spongy parenchyma, have been observed in some other species propagated in vitro, which was an adverse effect of the high sugar content and addition of plant growth regulators in the medium [Sáez et al 2012, Suárez et al 2019.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%