2014
DOI: 10.1364/oe.22.007222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong optical injection and the differential gain in a quantum dash laser

Abstract: By optically injecting a quantum dash laser and simultaneously producing a significant lowering of the device threshold, a large enhancement in the differential gain is realized. This effect is observed by way of a dramatic reduction in the linewidth enhancement factor and a large increase in the 3-dB modulation bandwidth, especially as the injection wavelength is blue-shifted. Compared to its free-running value, a 50X improvement in the laser's differential gain is found.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LEF was also measured above threshold and varied from 1 at threshold to 11 at 90 mA, attributed to the carrier density being unclamped at threshold which is due to the inhomogeneous gain broadening in Qdashes. Recently, an impressive 16.5 GHz -3dB small signal modulation bandwidth was reported by Lester et al [278] by slightly blue shifted (1.535 µm) injection locked Qdash laser under strong optical injection of 9.3 dB. This was approximately four times bandwidth enhancement compared to the free-running 4.5 GHz at 1.565 µm.…”
Section: Injection Locking/critical Feedback Of Qdash Lasersmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The LEF was also measured above threshold and varied from 1 at threshold to 11 at 90 mA, attributed to the carrier density being unclamped at threshold which is due to the inhomogeneous gain broadening in Qdashes. Recently, an impressive 16.5 GHz -3dB small signal modulation bandwidth was reported by Lester et al [278] by slightly blue shifted (1.535 µm) injection locked Qdash laser under strong optical injection of 9.3 dB. This was approximately four times bandwidth enhancement compared to the free-running 4.5 GHz at 1.565 µm.…”
Section: Injection Locking/critical Feedback Of Qdash Lasersmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, remarkable values of near zero above-threshold LEF and 5.9×10 -14 cm -2 differential gain were obtained under these conditions. This is highly attractive as packaged RF photonic transmitter in high-frequency optical fiber links [278,279]. A detailed dynamic study of an injection locked Qdash laser was carried out by Pochet et al [280,281] at zero detuning, and it was found that Qdash laser's large damping rate, gain compression coefficient, and sufficiently small LEF yielded period-one and stable locking operating conditions at bias currents close to threshold.…”
Section: Injection Locking/critical Feedback Of Qdash Lasersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the small-signal analysis, a current modulation I δ with frequency ω leads to the modulations of the carrier densities Based on the differential rate equation of the model [22], the H -factor of the nanostructured laser is given by The semiconductor laser under study is based on an InAs/InP Qdot structure, for which all the numerical parameters used in the simulation are described in [21]. As expected, Fig.…”
Section: Gs Esmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…(1) [19,20]. Reduction of the Hfactor was indeed pointed out owing to the decrease of the carrier density and thereby the refractive index variation, or directly to the relatively large exaltation of the differential gain [21]. Our recent work has demonstrated that the H -factor of solitary Qdot lasers is strongly dependent on the modulation frequency-larger at low-frequency regime and smaller at highfrequency one, which is different to bulk or quantum well lasers [22].…”
Section: Vg S Smentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Nevertheless, it is important to note that while the relaxation oscillation frequency increases with the injected power, the modulation bandwidth can in fact be lower than in the free-running case due to a frequency dip arising in the modulation response of the SL [23]. To this end, recent results have shown the possibility to maintain a relative broadband and flat modulation response by controlling both the differential gain and the linewidth enhancement factor of a quantum dash Fabry-Perot laser, operating under strong optical injection [24]. However, further enhancements of injection efficiency remain difficult to reach as both a low mirror reflectivity and a short cavity roundtrip times are required in order to maximize the coupling of the injected light into the slave laser cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%