2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2020.02.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress continuity in DEM-FEM multiscale coupling based on the generalized bridging domain method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FEM and DEM), many studies combining the two methods in a unified simulation have been proposed recently. They can be distinguished in two main families: direct interaction between FEM×DEM which includes surface or volume coupling [5][6][7][8][9]; and multi-scale coupling in which FEM is employed at macro scale while DEM is used at smaller scale [10][11][12][13][14]. Unlike the former which couples the two methods directly, the latter combines FEM and DEM by bridging the scales between them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FEM and DEM), many studies combining the two methods in a unified simulation have been proposed recently. They can be distinguished in two main families: direct interaction between FEM×DEM which includes surface or volume coupling [5][6][7][8][9]; and multi-scale coupling in which FEM is employed at macro scale while DEM is used at smaller scale [10][11][12][13][14]. Unlike the former which couples the two methods directly, the latter combines FEM and DEM by bridging the scales between them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%