Strengthening supply chain risk management for business continuity: a case study approach

Rashid, Ainul Haniza Mohd; Loke, Siew Phaik; Ooi, Keng‐Boon

doi:10.1504/ijmed.2014.069173

Cited by 11 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Collaboration across supply chains may significantly help mitigate risks (Christopher and Peck, 2004). Despite the existence of many studies to understand its relevance to SCR (Scholten et al , 2014) and performance (Kache and Seuring, 2014; Rashid et al , 2014), little has been researched about the role of collaboration to increase resilience to counterfeiting. Most studies about collaborative relationships aim to establish incentive alignment and joint coordination (Dekker et al , 2013).…”

Section: The Role Of Resilience Enablers In Combating Counterfeits In the Medicine Supply Chainmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nonetheless, the recent increase in the number of counterfeit medicine and their criticality in patients’ lives has led pharmaceutical companies to find new anti-counterfeit strategies (Lybecker, 2008) by adopting innovative ways to detect anomalies and provide real-time information to take decisions (Gould et al , 2010). End-to-end medicine supply chain visibility helps organizations to increase the level of control over partners and other supply chain members (Enyinda and Tolliver, 2009) and also monitor critical ways to improve threat awareness and better prepare for disturbances (Rashid et al , 2014; Tukamuhabwa et al , 2015). In a study carried out by Wilson et al (2016), they identified that all surveyed firms use physical and virtual market monitoring against counterfeiters.…”

Section: The Role Of Resilience Enablers In Combating Counterfeits In the Medicine Supply Chainmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Systematic review: resilience enablers to combat counterfeit medicines

Lima

Silva

Filho

et al. 2018

SCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to understand the role of resilience enablers in combating counterfeits in the medicine supply chain based on a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The objective is also to help practitioners and scholars as the review revealed that little research has been conducted on selecting and implementing practices to improve resilience to counterfeiting. Design/methodology/approach Based on the literature review, a content analysis was performed for 84 selected papers to explore the potential relationship among resilience enablers and counterfeit anti-measures. Findings This paper contributes to Supply Chain Resilience (SCR) research by summarizing the highly fragmented literature concerning how to combat counterfeiting. The SLR indicated reengineering, collaboration, visibility, innovation, SCR culture and trust as six key enablers to combat counterfeit medicines and identified literature gaps. Moreover, the paper discusses other resilience enablers which have been less studied in the literature and shows new avenues of research. Research limitations/implications This paper is limited in that it is an exploratory literature review and focuses only on three databases over the past 15 years. Furthermore, counterfeit is a rapidly evolving issue and anti-measure studies require frequent surveillance concerning new discoveries. Originality/value The main contribution of this paper is to provide a better understanding of enablers most often associated with counterfeit anti-measures, which, therefore, might help to increase resilience to counterfeit medicines. Moreover, research gaps involving enablers less associated with anti-measures are presented.

show abstract

Section: The Role Of Resilience Enablers In Combating Counterfeits In the Medicine Supply Chainmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Role Of Resilience Enablers In Combating Counterfeits In the Medicine Supply Chainmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic review: resilience enablers to combat counterfeit medicines

Lima

Silva

Filho

et al. 2018

SCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The contributions of OS capabilities and OR capabilities to impact BCM is suggested but not explicit, as may be observed in OR [15][16][17][18][19][20] and OS [21] foundations. Nevertheless, the value of their interaction has been established ever since interest in OR emerged, especially in the field of supply chain management [4,[22][23][24]. Clarifications about OR called the attention of researchers and practitioners [5] associated with organizational preparedness [25], community resilience [17,26], and resilience process systems involving Business Continuity [BC] and OS approaches [27].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Frameworks to understand how these capabilities interact and contribute to Sustainable Development [SD] have been identified [28]. Nevertheless, the interaction between OS capabilities and OR capabilities, to impact BCM, has not been sufficiently studied, although it has gained interest in recent years [4,23,27,29]. Consequently, there is still a wide field of research to be explored, ranging from the determination of OS capabilities and OR capabilities [30,31] to the validation of existing frameworks in different types of sectors [32], organizations such as SMEs [33], and developing countries [34,35].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainability and Resilience Organizational Capabilities to Enhance Business Continuity Management: A Literature Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although organizational sustainability and organizational resilience are critical dynamic capabilities for business continuity management, especially in times of crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic, there are few studies that analyze the relationship between these three concepts to understand risks management. For this reason, our study analyzes these relationships to contribute to a better understanding of the subject and to propose future lines of research. We use bibliometric and content analysis, based on the Web Of Science and Scopus databases, during the period between 1998 and 13 May 2021. Main findings indicate that there is a bidirectional relationship between organizational sustainability capabilities and organizational resilience capabilities, but there is not enough evidence of their relationship with business continuity management. Additionally, results allow us to infer that there are four groups of relationships between them: (1) From Risk Management to Business Continuity Management and Organizational Resilience; (2) Resilience and Business Continuity practices; (3) Business Continuity contribution to Innovation and Sustainability; (4) Dynamic Capabilities for Organizational Sustainability and Organizational Resilience to enhance Business Continuity Management. Moreover, different stages were identified to understand the impact of organizational sustainability capabilities and organizational resilience capabilities on business continuity management facing disruptive events.

show abstract

“…The results were summarized in Table A2 of the Appendix A. The new elements of resilience identified are: Robustness [30][31][32][33]137,138,[163][164][165][166][167]; contingency planning [2,[31][32][33]37,137,157,[167][168][169][170]; disruptive environment awareness [29,31,33,37,157,165,[169][170][171]; knowledge management [29,[31][32][33]37,163,165,169,172]; market adaptation [2,33,163,169,170]; and strategic alignment [32,173].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The challenges of global economies foster supply chains to have to increase their processes of collaboration and dependence between their nodes, generating an increase in the level of vulnerability to possible impacts and interruptions in their operations that may affect their sustainability. This has developed an emerging area of interest in supply chain management, considering resilience management as a strategic capability of companies, and causing an increase in this area of research. Additionally, supply chains should deal with the three dimensions of sustainability (economic, environmental, and social dimensions) by incorporating the three types of objectives in their strategy. Thus, there is a need to integrate both resilience and sustainability in supply chain management to increase competitiveness. In this paper, a systematic literature review is undertaken to analyze resilience management and its connection to increase supply chain sustainability. In the review, 232 articles published from 2000 to February 2020 in peer-reviewed journals in the Scopus and ScienceDirect databases are analyzed, classified, and synthesized. With the results, this paper develops a conceptual framework that integrates the fundamental elements for analyzing, measuring, and managing resilience to increase sustainability in the supply chain. Finally, conclusions, limitations, and future research lines are exposed.

show abstract

Strengthening supply chain risk management for business continuity: a case study approach

Cited by 11 publications

References 0 publications

Systematic review: resilience enablers to combat counterfeit medicines

Systematic review: resilience enablers to combat counterfeit medicines

Sustainability and Resilience Organizational Capabilities to Enhance Business Continuity Management: A Literature Review

A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About