Systematic review: resilience enablers to combat counterfeit medicines

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to understand the role of resilience enablers in combating counterfeits in the medicine supply chain based on a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The objective is also to help practitioners and scholars as the review revealed that little research has been conducted on selecting and implementing practices to improve resilience to counterfeiting. Design/methodology/approach Based on the literature review, a content analysis was performed for 84 selected papers to explore the potential relationship among resilience enablers and counterfeit anti-measures. Findings This paper contributes to Supply Chain Resilience (SCR) research by summarizing the highly fragmented literature concerning how to combat counterfeiting. The SLR indicated reengineering, collaboration, visibility, innovation, SCR culture and trust as six key enablers to combat counterfeit medicines and identified literature gaps. Moreover, the paper discusses other resilience enablers which have been less studied in the literature and shows new avenues of research. Research limitations/implications This paper is limited in that it is an exploratory literature review and focuses only on three databases over the past 15 years. Furthermore, counterfeit is a rapidly evolving issue and anti-measure studies require frequent surveillance concerning new discoveries. Originality/value The main contribution of this paper is to provide a better understanding of enablers most often associated with counterfeit anti-measures, which, therefore, might help to increase resilience to counterfeit medicines. Moreover, research gaps involving enablers less associated with anti-measures are presented.

Blockchain technology: implications for operations and supply chain management

“…Thus, research has investigated supply chain transparency and related issues such as regarding the origins of materials, including illicit subcontracting and product counterfeiting (e.g. Lima et al, 2018;Machado et al, 2018), concerns over modern slavery (e.g. Gold et al, 2015;New, 2015;Stevenson and Cole, 2018), and how to extend sustainable practices and governance upstream in supply chains (e.g.…”

Local food supply chain resilience to constitutional change: the Brexit effect

“…Meanwhile, other work has examined the potential threat of product counterfeiting, which may originate from within or beyond the boundaries of the genuine product's supply chain and is likely to be a continuous threat rather than a one-off large-scale disruption (e.g. de Lima et al, 2018). Yet, to the best of our knowledge, the literature has not considered resilience to external constitutional change, such as that currently being experienced in the UK as a result of Brexit.…”

Identification of Disruptions and Associated Resilience Strategies in Blood Supply Chain Using a New Combined Approach

“…The purpose of the security strategy is to increase supply chain capability for the identification of suspicious and unusual elements (64). In this regard, secure information is provided to all stakeholders for the prevention of attacks and intrusions (65). Security is an essential feature of any supply chain and should be predesigned to reduce the occurrence of disruptions (66).…”