2020
DOI: 10.1080/02681102.2020.1841713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthening digital inclusion through e-government: cohesive ICT training programs to intensify digital competency

Abstract: Governments around the globe are in a quest for successful egovernment services. In this pursuit, one of the most significant barriers to e-government resilience is insufficient training. The objective of this study is to examine the impact of ICT training programs on the success of e-government services to improve digital competency along with decreasing the digital divide concerning developing societies. The pragmatic research process served as a baseline of this study, and a quasi-experimental research appr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(103 reference statements)
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These reasons included low perceived usefulness (Berkowsky et al 2013;Poveda 2018), lack of trust (Chohan and Hu 2020) and fear of making mistakes (Gatti et al 2017). Additionally, on an individual level, a few scholars have specified technophobia as one reason for not switching to using ICTs (Arthanat et al 2016;Chohan and Hu 2020;Dutta and Mathur 2014;Ogbonnaya-Ogburu et al 2019;Rabayah 2008). The embarrassment further reiterates this over a lack of digital self-efficacy (Kuo et al 2013;Rikard et al 2018), inconsistent knowledge base (Gatti et al 2017;Mayhorn et al 2004), lack of confidence (Ogbonnaya-Ogburu et al 2019;Rommes et al 2005), lack of self-esteem (Khan and Ghadially 2009;Rommes et al 2005) and lack of time (Poveda 2018).…”
Section: Barriers Found At Learner Level A) Motivation and Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These reasons included low perceived usefulness (Berkowsky et al 2013;Poveda 2018), lack of trust (Chohan and Hu 2020) and fear of making mistakes (Gatti et al 2017). Additionally, on an individual level, a few scholars have specified technophobia as one reason for not switching to using ICTs (Arthanat et al 2016;Chohan and Hu 2020;Dutta and Mathur 2014;Ogbonnaya-Ogburu et al 2019;Rabayah 2008). The embarrassment further reiterates this over a lack of digital self-efficacy (Kuo et al 2013;Rikard et al 2018), inconsistent knowledge base (Gatti et al 2017;Mayhorn et al 2004), lack of confidence (Ogbonnaya-Ogburu et al 2019;Rommes et al 2005), lack of self-esteem (Khan and Ghadially 2009;Rommes et al 2005) and lack of time (Poveda 2018).…”
Section: Barriers Found At Learner Level A) Motivation and Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low funds then lead to the lesser geographical coverage of the DLTPs(Poveda 2018). Moreover, the IEC activities are not adequately organised(Chohan and Hu 2020;Madon et al 2009). Without standardised strategies, all efforts remain inefficacious Kantamneni and Chintalapati (2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IS success model (Delone & McLean, 2003), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Davis, 1989) which was further modified as UTAUT (Venkatesh et al, 2003) and Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) (Montano et al, 2008). These particular theories were adopted by many IS researchers in the context of citizens' intention to use public sector services (Alshehri et al, 2012;Chohan & Hu, 2020a;Hu et al, 2019;Liang et al, 2017). In this section, we provide an overview of the literature on smart government service, IoT service orchestration, digital society affinity, and public perceived value.…”
Section: Literature Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the public sector seeks to innovate, embrace emerging technologies, and embark on the technology journey, integration becomes the smart path to success. The increasing growth of information and communication technology (ICT) has motivated the government to present innovative technologies in public services (Bolívar & Manuel, 2016;Chohan & Hu, 2020a;Todisco et al, 2020). Digital online platforms have significantly penetrated every field of society (van Dijck, 2019) especially in digital initiatives of smart government, to develop innovative models of service distribution by integrating physical, digital, and public environment (Rochet & Correa, 2016;Scholl & Scholl, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empowered citizens form the backbone of a well-functioning democracy (Sørensen, 1997). For some time, Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) have been accepted and promoted by governments and civil society organizations (CSOs) as being instrumental in empowering their citizens by improving their capabilities and the control they have over their own lives (Chohan & Hu, 2020a;Stone & Can, 2021). Empowerment as a concept is related to the word 'power', i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%