2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0958-9465(02)00141-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strength and durability of lightweight concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
0
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
53
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at the age of 28 days, the splitting tensile strength of the POCP concrete in this study ranged from 6.5% to 8% of the compressive strength. This is similar to the tensile/compressive strength ratio ranging from 6.6% to 9% of the lightweight concrete made with an artificial lightweight aggregate, as reported by Haque (2014) [24]. A parabolic relationship with a correlation coefficient of 0.86 was observed between the 28-day compressive strength and splitting tensile of the POCP concrete, as shown in Figure 19.…”
Section: -(5)supporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, at the age of 28 days, the splitting tensile strength of the POCP concrete in this study ranged from 6.5% to 8% of the compressive strength. This is similar to the tensile/compressive strength ratio ranging from 6.6% to 9% of the lightweight concrete made with an artificial lightweight aggregate, as reported by Haque (2014) [24]. A parabolic relationship with a correlation coefficient of 0.86 was observed between the 28-day compressive strength and splitting tensile of the POCP concrete, as shown in Figure 19.…”
Section: -(5)supporting
confidence: 87%
“…In general, the splitting tensile strength for normal weight concrete ranges from 8% to 14% of its compressive strength [23]. The splitting/compressive strength ratio for normal weight concrete is higher when compared to the lightweight concrete [24]. Holm (2000) [25] reported that lightweight concrete that is moist cured has a splitting tensile strength of generally between 6% and 7% of its compressive strength.…”
Section: -(5)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While several studies comparing the carbonation resistance of lightweight concrete and normal weight concrete can be found in the literature, that of Haque et al [13] is perhaps most relevant to the current study. These authors found that after 7 days of initial curing, the carbonation depth measured for lightweight concrete was only slightly greater than that measured for normal weight concrete, at similar strength levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio in this study is lower than the normal weight concrete by 29 -49%. It also has been reported by Haque et al (2004) that the splitting tensile strength to compressive strength ratio of LWAC is lower than that for normal weight concrete in the equivalent grade. In addition, the splitting tensile/compressive strength ratio of high strength lightweight concrete under continuously moist cured, also reached 6 -7% (Omar & Mohamed 2002).…”
Section: Compressive Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 70%