2022
DOI: 10.1002/tesq.3132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic Self‐Regulation for Speaking English as a Foreign Language: Scale Development and Validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data preparation yielded 95 valid samples from the initial sampling of 134 participants, and the sample size meets the requirements of statistical testing methods involved in our study, including descriptive analysis, one-way repeated measures MANOVA, ANOVA, and the multiple regression analyses ( Pallant, 2016 ; Frey, 2018 ). Following some scholars (e.g., Barkaoui et al, 2013 ; Sun, 2020 , 2022a , b ), we run a descriptive analysis of the means of L2 learners’ use of the four metacognitive strategies across tasks. We then used the line chart generated in Excel via the value of the means to illustrate the variance in the Chinese EFL learners’ IDs in metacognitive strategy use across tasks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data preparation yielded 95 valid samples from the initial sampling of 134 participants, and the sample size meets the requirements of statistical testing methods involved in our study, including descriptive analysis, one-way repeated measures MANOVA, ANOVA, and the multiple regression analyses ( Pallant, 2016 ; Frey, 2018 ). Following some scholars (e.g., Barkaoui et al, 2013 ; Sun, 2020 , 2022a , b ), we run a descriptive analysis of the means of L2 learners’ use of the four metacognitive strategies across tasks. We then used the line chart generated in Excel via the value of the means to illustrate the variance in the Chinese EFL learners’ IDs in metacognitive strategy use across tasks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated earlier (refer to “INTRODUCTION” section), the conceptualization of IDs in metacognitive strategy use during L2 speech production in our study was conducted through framing the concept in Kormos’ Model. In the research field of speaking, models generated in psycholinguistics are broadly acknowledged and employed (e.g., Kormos, 2006 , 2011 ; Skehan, 2016 ; Yahya, 2019 ; Sun, 2022a , b ), among which Levelt’s (1989) model of monolingual speech production has become “one of the most comprehensive and widely used theoretical frameworks” for monolingual speech production ( Sun, 2016 , p. 27). Based on this model, De Bot (1992) proposed his L2 speech production model, followed by many similar research efforts (e.g., Poulisse and Bongaerts, 1994 ; Towell et al, 1996 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second/foreign language (L2) speech production can be subject to various individual difference factors. A review of the literature indicates that common individual difference factors examined in the field of L2 speaking include, but are not limited to, learning environments, learning strategies, willingness-to-communicate, motivation, and anxiety (Sun and Teng, 2021 ; Sun, 2022 , 2023 ; Sun and Zhang, 2022 ). Although there is no consensus on what individual differences encompass, the literature has witnessed a growing interest in research on individual differences in L2 speaking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%