1993
DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250140105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic assets and organizational rent

Abstract: We build on an emerging strategy literature that views the firm as a bundle of resources and capabilities, and examine conditions that contribute to the realization of sustainable economic rents. Because of (1) resource-market imperfections and (2) discretionary managerial decisions about resource development and deployment, we expect firms to differ (in and out of equilibrium) in the resources and capabilities they control. This asymmetry in turn can be a source of sustainable economic rent. The paper focuses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

57
3,749
3
268

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6,060 publications
(4,316 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
57
3,749
3
268
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of contributions highlight individual cognition in structuring the search for new resource combinations (e.g. Amit & Schoemaker, 1993;Foss, 1993;Gavetti & Levinthal, 2000, Gavetti, Levinthal & Rivkin, 2005Knudsen & Levinthal, 2007), but these ideas do not seem to be well integrated into the core of the RBV. In addition, the decision-making process about resource allocation and capability development is structured by the organization design (Adner & Levinthal, 2004;Gavetti, 2005;Foss, Foss & Klein, 2007;Christensen & Knudsen, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of contributions highlight individual cognition in structuring the search for new resource combinations (e.g. Amit & Schoemaker, 1993;Foss, 1993;Gavetti & Levinthal, 2000, Gavetti, Levinthal & Rivkin, 2005Knudsen & Levinthal, 2007), but these ideas do not seem to be well integrated into the core of the RBV. In addition, the decision-making process about resource allocation and capability development is structured by the organization design (Adner & Levinthal, 2004;Gavetti, 2005;Foss, Foss & Klein, 2007;Christensen & Knudsen, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intangible assets, such as competences and capabilities, seem to be especially relevant to the development of competitive advantage (Barney, 2001). Amit and Schoemaker (1993) further emphasize that capabilities are grounded on processes that mainly consist of activities developed, carried and exchanged by the firm's human capital, that is, by the company's employees at all hierarchical levels.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assets theory states that assets and abilities that are rare, lasting, imperfectly mobile and difficult to imitate enable the company to gain a sustainable competitive advantage [2,97]. Companies usually build their strategies basing simultaneously on various attributes, one of them is almost always a brand because branded products are chosen more frequently than unbranded ones [20,220].…”
Section: The Benefits Producers Get From Strong Brandsmentioning
confidence: 99%