2016
DOI: 10.1117/1.jrs.10.046025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strata-based forest fuel classification for wild fire hazard assessment using terrestrial LiDAR

Abstract: Strata-based forest fuel classification for wild fire hazard assessment using terrestrial LiDAR,"Abstract. Fuel structural characteristics affect fire behavior including fire intensity, spread rate, flame structure, and duration, therefore, quantifying forest fuel structure has significance in understanding fire behavior as well as providing information for fire management activities (e.g., planned burns, suppression, fuel hazard assessment, and fuel treatment). This paper presents a method of forest fuel stra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate measurement of vegetation at different spatial and temporal scales is critical in informing a range of ecological and natural resource management disciplines [3][4][5]. Estimates of vegetation characteristics such as canopy height, canopy cover, diameter at breast height, and above-ground biomass have been identified as important metrics for carbon accounting, wildlife habitat diversity, precision forestry, fire behaviour modelling and understory forest dynamics for eco-hydrological monitoring [6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accurate measurement of vegetation at different spatial and temporal scales is critical in informing a range of ecological and natural resource management disciplines [3][4][5]. Estimates of vegetation characteristics such as canopy height, canopy cover, diameter at breast height, and above-ground biomass have been identified as important metrics for carbon accounting, wildlife habitat diversity, precision forestry, fire behaviour modelling and understory forest dynamics for eco-hydrological monitoring [6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data capture from above the canopy (satellite, aircraft or drone) is the most common approach to characterising the 3D structure of forests [11][12][13][14]. Known limitations in observing detailed below canopy structure from airborne sensors have led to investigation into terrestrial data capture [7,15,16]. The two methods that have been used previously for capturing 3D information describing forests are laser scanning and image-based point clouds [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study in the agro-pastoral ecotone of northern China, Xu et al [84] proposed a model for estimating grass height and canopy cover from TLS data, which explained 70 and 72% of the observed variability respectively. Better results were obtained by Chen et al [85], who, in a study in South-East Australia, established models for estimating the litter depth and percentage cover of the different vertical layers of the understory from TLS metrics, with R 2 values of 0.9 and of 0.8-0.9, respectively. Table 4.…”
Section: The Indirect Estimation (Ie) Approachmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Consequently, there is an urgent need to mitigate the impact caused by this global and recurring phenomenon, and because satellite data has the advantage of wide coverage, timeliness, and low cost, it has been pivotal to meet this requirement for more than four decades [9][10][11]. Using these ideal sensors and platforms, researchers have carried out research on fire risk assessment [12][13][14][15], fuel management [16][17][18], forest fire detection [19][20][21][22][23][24], fire behavior modeling [25][26][27], smoke emissions estimation [28][29][30], and analysis of fire impacts on air quality and FRP (fire radiative power) [31][32][33][34]. In addition, forest fire detection has always been a hot spot of research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%