2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain rate effects on the mechanical properties of a Fe–Mn–Al alloy under dynamic impact deformations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, there is a way to relate the strain rate sensitivity with the thermal activation volume of the material, as previously reported by [35]. Therefore, the derivation of the thermal activation volume, taking into account the strain rate sensitivity, can be expressed as follows [11,35]:…”
Section: Strain Rate Sensitivity and Thermal Activation Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, there is a way to relate the strain rate sensitivity with the thermal activation volume of the material, as previously reported by [35]. Therefore, the derivation of the thermal activation volume, taking into account the strain rate sensitivity, can be expressed as follows [11,35]:…”
Section: Strain Rate Sensitivity and Thermal Activation Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, neural network models were used to predict the flow behaviors of 28CrMnMoV steel [19], glass fiber reinforced polymers [20], A356 aluminum alloy [21], and 42CrMo steel [22]. In addition, dynamic recrystallization (DRX) model [23], Zerilli-Amstrong (ZA) model [24,25], mechanical threshold stress plasticity (MTS) model [26], Cellular Automata (CA) model [27], and Bonder-Partom (BP) model [28] belong to the physics-based models. The study of V-4Cr-4Ti [29], medium carbon and vanadium microalloyed steels [30], and Mg-Al-Zn alloy [31] shows that the constitutive equation based on microscopic mechanism has good applicability, which can be used to characterize the relationship between flow stress and microstructure during high-temperature rheological process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers prefer the ZA model to the JC model as the former not only incorporates the coupled effects of strain rate and temperature but also considers dislocation characteristics for particular structures. Even though parameters for the ZA model for the Ti6Al4V alloy and different steels [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] have been proposed in recent years, some materials constants for the ZA model are very difficult to validate as they require a stress at 0 K and the athermal stress of the materials. Also, it is not suggested to use the ZA model at temperatures above a half of the melting temperature of materials [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%