Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Titanium 2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781119296126.ch261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constitutive Equations to Predict Stress‐Strain Behaviour for a β Titanium Alloy at High Strain Rates Over a Wide Range of Temperatures

Abstract: Stress-strain curves of the Ti-6Cr-5Mo-5V-4Al (Ti6554) alloy obtained from Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) tests over a wide range of temperatures (293-1173K) and strain rates (10 3 -10 4 s -1 ) were employed to fit parameters for the Johnson-Cook(JC) and the Zerilli-Armstrong(ZA) models, respectively. The JC model is able to capture the stress-strain behaviour of the Ti6554 alloy better than the ZA model. However, the limit of the JC model is that it can only predict the flow behaviour accurately in a nar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to acquire the JC and ZA material constants for the Ti-6Cr-5Mo-5V-4Al alloy, Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) experiments were carried out. The results from these experiments were used by the authors' research group in order to calculate the constants in the JC and ZA material models for the Ti-6Cr-5Mo-5V-4Al alloy [328]. The calculated JC and ZA parameters are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Materials Constitutive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to acquire the JC and ZA material constants for the Ti-6Cr-5Mo-5V-4Al alloy, Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) experiments were carried out. The results from these experiments were used by the authors' research group in order to calculate the constants in the JC and ZA material models for the Ti-6Cr-5Mo-5V-4Al alloy [328]. The calculated JC and ZA parameters are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Materials Constitutive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%