Contradictory results in the literature led to a re-analysis of previously collected data which failed to provide evidence for a relationship between behaviors in an open-field or a reaction-to-handling test and immobilization-produced gastric erosions.The relative ease with which gastric erosions may be produced experimentally in the rat has led to several investigations of the psychobiological factors which may influence susceptibility and to correlational studies of the behavioral characteristics of susceptible and nonsusceptible animals. Gastric erosions in the glandular portion of the rat's stomach are most reliably produced by a period of physical immobilization plus food and water deprivation. Sines (1961Sines ( , 1962 has shown that animals selectively bred for high "ulcer" susceptibility are more "emotional" (show more defecation) and are more active in an open-field than a random population of Sprague-Dawley controls. In contrast, Mikhail and Broadhurst ( 1965 ) , using rats selectively bred for high and low emotional reactivity, failed to confirm the hypothesis (based on Sines' data) that the more reactive animals would be more susceptible to gastric lesions.Since the above studies used selectively bred animals, it seemed reasonable to investigate this same relationship in unselected populations. T o this end data collected from previously published and unpublished studies conducted in this laboratory were re-analyzed. The animals were either Charles River ( C D ) rats or rats from a genetically heterogeneous background. The early life experiences of these animals differed from experiment to experiment and in some experiments the animals were caged individually and in others they were group-housed.In all these studies the rats (approximately 90 days of age) were deprived of food and water for 18 hr. prior to a 6-hr. period of immobilization in flexible wire mesh. The details of the immobilization procedure and a description of the resulting lesions are outlined in previous publications (Ader, 1963; Ader, Beels, 8: Tatum, 1960). At least 2 wk. prior to immobilization all these animals were observed in an open-field and/or a reaction-to-handling test (Ader & Friedman, 1964).The results shown in Table 1 provide no evidence for a relationship between emotional reactivity and suspectibility to gastric erosions. In only one in-'The experiments on which these data are based were supported by USPHS Grants MH-03655 and K3-MH-6318 from the National Institute of Mental Health and were conducted in accordance with the APA statement of "Guiding principles for the humane care and use of animals," December 15, 1962.